Lodi News-Sentinel

Trump gives mixed signals on background checks to buy guns

- By Eli Stokols

WASHINGTON — Five days after 31 people were killed in two mass shootings, President Donald Trump has sounded authoritat­ive in promising to do “something big” to expand gun safety laws — but his words are riddled with enough ambiguity to warrant questions about his intent to follow through.

Before he left the White House on Wednesday to visit with victims and first responders in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso, Texas, Trump told reporters that “there is no political appetite” for a ban on assault-style weapons, which were used in last weekend’s two massacres.

But, he went on, expanding background checks for gun purchases and transfers could be a different story. He has asked his attorneys what he could achieve through an executive order on gun safety in case Congress does not act when it returns from recess in September.

“There’s a great appetite — and I mean a very strong appetite — for background checks,” the president said. “And I think we can bring up background checks like we’ve never had before. I think both Republican and Democrat are getting close to a bill on — they’re doing something on background checks.”

The president has defined an end goal — keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill — in broad terms, seemingly conflating background checks and socalled red flag laws in a way so that either could be defined as a major accomplish­ment.

“I’m looking to do background checks,” he said. “I think background checks are important. I don’t want to put guns into the hands of mentally unstable people or people with rage or hate, sick people. I don’t want to — I’m all in favor of it.”

But Trump’s optimism does not seem to align with Washington’s static political reality. While opinion polls show expanding background checks is broadly popular, a majority of Republican lawmakers oppose it, complicati­ng the passage of federal legislatio­n by a dysfunctio­nal, deeply divided Congress.

Personally, Trump appears sincere about wanting to expand background checks on all gun purchases, seeing the opportunit­y for another Rose Garden signing ceremony celebratin­g a signature accomplish­ment. He has conveyed as much to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the leadership of the National Rifle Associatio­n, according to two people familiar with his thinking.

But he has said that before, raising the hopes of gun safety advocates, only to back off.

Trump offered support for expanding background checks after a gunman with a semiautoma­tic rifle killed 17 students and staff members at a high school in Parkland, Fla., in February 2018. But he quickly abandoned the idea after the NRA reacted negatively.

Now, as he restates his willingnes­s to accept universal background checks, the president is painting with a broad rhetorical brush and leaving himself plenty of wiggle room for proposals that would achieve far less.

Trump has stopped short of endorsing a proposed bill to expand background checks on gun sales across the country, although he spoke this week with both cosponsors, Sens. Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., and Patrick J. Toomey, R-Pa. The bipartisan legislatio­n failed to pass the Senate in 2013.

The NRA opposes the ManchinToo­mey bill and its chief executive, Wayne LaPierre, has made that clear to the president in recent days, according to a person familiar with recent conversati­ons.

At the moment, 21 states require some level of background checks, including 12 that have passed universal background check measures. But 29 states require none.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States