Lodi News-Sentinel

GOP, Dems alike worried by media agency’s changes

- By Rachel Oswald

WASHINGTON — It was, in essence, an oversight hearing of a relatively small government agency, but what it amounted to was an indictment of a bureau taken over by an ally of President Donald J. Trump and made unrecogniz­able to the members of Congress — from both parties — who fund and monitor it.

Republican­s and Democrats joined in expressing anger and dismay at what has happened to the U.S. Agency for Global Media since a Michael Pack was confirmed as its director in early June.

The agency, with an annual budget just under $1 billion and a staff of 4,000 employees and 1,500 stringer reporters, is home to the U.S. government’s internatio­nal broadcasti­ng operations, including the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia, which have long been respected as trustworth­y sources for informatio­n for people in authoritar­ian countries whose news is censored, restricted and blocked.

Since being confirmed in June to his post in a partisan Senate vote, Pack has fired all of the heads of the agency’s news organizati­ons, ordered the news networks to publish proTrump administra­tion editorials, refused to renew the work visas of dozens of VOA-employed foreign journalist­s who speak the local languages of the countries to which they broadcast, and flouted congressio­nal spending directives by essentiall­y impounding funding for projects to combat internet censorship in repressive societies.

Rep. Michael McCaul, the committee’s top Republican, said he had “grown very concerned the agency’s mission is being undermined from the top.”

“Most problemati­c to me has been what I can only categorize as the impoundmen­t of funds for the Open Technology Fund,” the Texas Republican continued, adding that Pack was ignoring “the will of Congress.”

In July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an emergency injunction to block Pack’s effort to fire the fund’s bipartisan board of directors and its top officials, concluding that Pack likely lacked the statutory authority to do so. The fund is now suing Pack in federal claims court in an effort to force the release of $18 million of its $20 million original congressio­nal appropriat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States