Lodi News-Sentinel

Prop. 23 aimed at dialysis industry trailing early on

- By Melody Gutierrez

A $100-million effort to impose new regulation­s on the dialysis industry appeared to be heading for defeat in early results Tuesday.

Propositio­n 23 would require dialysis clinics to employ at least one doctor who would be on site whenever patients are receiving treatment. Supporters of the measure, including the Service Employees Internatio­nal Union-United Healthcare Workers West, said dialysis clinics were putting profits over patient care by not having a doctor available in the event of complicati­ons or an emergency.

Opponents, however, argued the measure was the latest attempt by SEIUUHW to weaponize the ballot box to try to force the dialysis industry to spend millions to defend itself when the union’s real interest is getting clinic workers to unionize. The dialysis industry put more than $100 million into fighting the measure, saying the unnecessar­y added cost would lead to dialysis clinics closing, which would put patients at risk.

In California, there are roughly 600 dialysis clinics treating thousands of people suffering from kidney failure with machines that remove a patient’s blood and filter it to remove waste and excess fluids before returning the blood to their body. Patients typically require dialysis three days a week for about four hours a day in order to live. Due to the high demand for dialysis, clinic operators say they are typically open six days a week for up to 16 hours a day.

In addition to having a doctor on site at all times, Propositio­n 23 would require clinics to report dialysis infection informatio­n to the California Department of Public Health every three months, which would be posted on the state agency’s website. Clinics could face a fine of up to $100,000 for failing to report the data or reporting inaccurate informatio­n.

Clinics are currently required to report dialysis infection-related informatio­n to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The measure would also require clinics to obtain approval from the state’s public health department before closing or substantia­lly reducing services. Propositio­n 23 would bar clinics from refusing access to a patient based on their insurance.

Most people on dialysis in California are covered by Medicare, which extends coverage to people with kidney failure regardless of age or disability status.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States