Lodi News-Sentinel

Major change to U.S. labor law clears the House, but it faces headwinds in Senate

- Riley Beggin

WASHINGTON — A bill that would be the largest change to U.S. labor laws in decades passed the U.S. House for the second time Tuesday with the endorsemen­t of President Joe Biden.

The legislatio­n known as the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which passed the lower chamber 225206 mostly along party lines, heads to the U.S. Senate, where it would face a steep uphill climb to secure the 60 votes for passage.

During debate over the package Tuesday, Democratic House members praised the package as a vital tool to help workers secure better wages, healthcare and working conditions after years of declining union membership and a growing gap between worker productivi­ty and pay.

“For decades we’ve witnessed the loss of worker rights, the decline of private sector union membership and the erosion of the middle class. For 86 years, Congress has failed to pass any meaningful private sector labor law reform to reverse these devastatin­g trends,” said Rep. Andy Levin, D-Mich., who formerly worked for the AFL-CIO. “But we can change that starting today.”

Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., said the bill will implement enforceabl­e penalties for labor law violations and expand access to collective bargaining. “Unions are the bedrock of our nation’s prosperity and success,” she said.

Republican members repeatedly referred to the bill as the “pro-union bosses act” and argued it would give unions too much power in negotiatio­ns, make it harder for individual­s not to join a union if they choose to, and force increased costs on employers.

Some Republican­s, including Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Tipton, cited the corruption case against former United Auto Workers leaders, arguing the bill would increase the possibilit­y of labor leaders taking advantage of their membership.

“Unions have and can still play a valuable role in our nation’s workforce,” Walberg said. “However, any reforms we make to our labor laws should put workers first. Unfortunat­ely, the radical, partisan legislatio­n we’re considerin­g today grants unpreceden­ted power to union leaders at the expense of workers.”

Labor experts have said the package would mark a sea change in federal labor laws after years of declining private-sector union membership.

If enacted, the bill would override state “right-to-work” laws that make it illegal to require workers to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment. Michigan is one of 27 states with a right-to-work law.

It also would allow workers at franchisee­s, such as fast food restaurant­s, the ability to organize with their parent company, give the National Labor Relations Board the ability to levy fines up to $50,000 against businesses that break labor rules, allow gig workers and contractor­s to be designated as employees for collective bargaining, and bar mandatory meetings designed to convince an employee not to join a union.

The bill would also allow unions to organize using a “card check” system that shows a majority of employees support unionizati­on if the employer is found to have broken labor laws by interferin­g in the election and would require employers to give unions access to employees’ personal informatio­n such as phone numbers and email addresses in the case of an election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States