Lodi News-Sentinel

City addresses questions about homeless center

- NEWS-SENTINEL STAFF WRITER

Wes Bowers

In its latest round of keeping the community informed about the proposed access center for homeless individual­s, the City of Lodi on Thursday released answers to frequently asked questions received from a survey it recently conducted about the project.

The city responded to 11 questions posed by community members, which staff said were the most common received while reviewing comments made by residents.

The center is not a homeless encampment, but a facility that will reduce barriers to shelter resources for unhoused individual­s.

Three locations are currently being considered for the center, including a vacant building at 710 N. Sacramento St. and two pieces of city-owned property on Thurman Road in the industrial area of town, and near Salas Park.

One concern posed in the survey was that the access center would not solve the city’s homeless problem, and that staff needed to “find a way to stop other municipali­ties from sending their homeless to Lodi.”

In its response, the city said it collaborat­es with other municipali­ties in the area, and staff was unaware of any other agency transporti­ng unsheltere­d individual­s outside of their own area, and there was no evidence that other cities are dropping their unsheltere­d off in Lodi.

The city has stated in the past that many unsheltere­d individual­s in town have ties to Lodi through family, friends, employment or long-term residency, and that they have not come from other cities to seek out resources in Lodi.

In addition, the city said the San Joaquin County 2019 pointin-time count survey shared that 72% of respondent­s reported being continuous­ly homeless for longer than one year.

Some residents suggested a centralize­d facility near the county seat in Stockton that could provide education, re-entry to the workplace and access to rehabilita­tion and medical centers would be more ideal.

However, the city said a county-wide location for all homeless in the region would limit the overall resources available to cities.

“Moreover, we cannot force anyone to go to another city to seek resources for social services,” the city said. “If the individual does not want to leave their home and community in Lodi and all of the resources are allocated to a centralize­d location in another city, there would be minimal resources available locally and we could potentiall­y see our unsheltere­d count increase.”

Many residents claimed in the survey that the homeless in Lodi do not want help and refuse to obey laws or conform to rules.

The city responded that while there are some who do not want assistance, a “great majority” of the homeless do want help, adding if a sufficient amount of resources and shelter are provided for those that want it, there will be a significan­t reduction in the number of unhoused individ

uals on city streets.

“We have made great progress with our mobile Access Center volunteers receiving more than 80 referrals in just two months for assistance, demonstrat­ing the need and want for assistance locally,” the city said. “Unfortunat­ely, current resources are limited and wait lists are long for those in need of housing, treatment services, or job readiness training. Having these resources available locally would allow us to expedite services to those in need.”

Residents also asked why the homeless can’t be transporte­d to another city or removed from public spaces to solve the problem. The city responded that moving them to another city was not only inhumane, but it was not a true solution.

In addition, the Martin v. City of Boise ruling provided that homeless individual­s cannot be prosecuted for merely sleeping outside on public property if there is not an adequate shelter for them to stay.

“An access center lowbarrier emergency shelter in Lodi would provide adequate alternativ­es, which would allow the city to focus enforcemen­t efforts on reducing the occurrence of camping in public right-ofways, parks, in front of businesses, alleyways, etc., because unsheltere­d individual­s could utilize the center’s shelter facilities,” the city said.

Other concerns raised included security at the site and funding.

Any site chosen, the said, will implement a good neighbor policy with round-the-clock private security that will routinely patrol the entire campus to ensure the safety of both clients and residents in the area.

The project will be funded by the American Rescue Plan Act, a Local Early Action Planning grant, and a Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant.

“We know that this is not an overnight solution, however if nothing is done, nothing will change,” the city said. “An access center allows the community a gateway to much needed resources that otherwise either would not be available or would be insufficie­nt to meet the needs of our growing unsheltere­d population.”

For more informatio­n about the project, contact the Community Developmen­t Department’s Neighborho­od Services Division at Neighborho­odServices@lodi.gov. For updates on the Lodi Access Center Engagement Process, visit www.lodi.gov/1037/LodiAccess-Center.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States