Lodi News-Sentinel

Will MLB nix extra-innings runner rule?

- Jack Harris and Bill Shaikin

DENVER — Prior to Tuesday’s MLB All-Star Game in Denver, commission­er Rob Manfred and MLB Players Associatio­n executive director Tony Clark addressed a range of issues concerning the sport at a Baseball Writers’ Associatio­n of America meeting.

Here are five key topics they discussed.

Doublehead­er and extra-inning rules — Baseball traditiona­lists everywhere can rejoice.

Seven-inning doublehead­ers and automatic extra-inning baserunner­s might soon be a thing of the past.

Manfred said those rules — created as part of the league’s efforts to safely continue play during the pandemic — are unlikely to “become part of our permanent landscape” beyond this season.

Manfred said the league might discuss other “non-radical” rules changes with the Players Associatio­n, such as adding the designated hitter to the National League or implementi­ng regulation­s against infield shifts.

But the doublehead­er and extra-inning changes that were made prior to last season might be in their final days.

Vaccinatio­n effort — Clark said the union wasn’t making an outright “push” for its remaining unvaccinat­ed players to get the COVID-19 vaccinatio­n but insisted they had “encouraged from the beginning” for players to do so.

Even as stadiums return to full capacity and masks become scarcer around ballparks, the pandemic has continued to have an effect on the season, most recently when the Philadelph­ia Phillies had to place four players on the COVID-19 injured list last week.

According to Manfred, 85% of the league’s Tier 1 personnel (a group that includes players, coaches and those who most closely interact with them) have been vaccinated. Seven teams, however, still remain below the 85% threshold, the point at which social distancing restrictio­ns are relaxed for clubs.

Manfred didn’t rule out the possibilit­y of the league potentiall­y requiring players to be vaccinated — he noted that the commission­er’s office had a mandatory vaccinatio­n policy — but said conversati­ons with the MLBPA hadn’t reached that point yet.

“I understand people have different views,” Manfred said. “I wish everybody’d get vaccinated. I think it would be a good thing for us generally. But you’ve got to work it through with the people that represent the players.”

The fate of the A’s in Oakland — Manfred said the process for trying to get the Oakland Athletics a new ballpark in Oakland was heading toward an ultimatum, with upcoming votes by local government­al authoritie­s on a proposed stadium project likely to “determine the fate of baseball

in Oakland.”

The Oakland City Council is set to vote next week on a stadium proposal at Howard Terminal in Oakland, the latest of several efforts to build the A’s a new ballpark in the Bay Area. If that project is not approved, Manfred said the A’s potential relocation to Las Vegas or another city would “take on more pace.”

“Las Vegas is a viable alternativ­e for a major league club, and there are other viable alternativ­es that I haven’t even turned the A’s loose to even exploring at this point,” Manfred added. “Thinking about this as a bluff is a mistake. This is the decision point for Oakland.”

Other rules changes — Although the seven-inning doublehead­ers and extra-inning modificati­ons likely are going away, other potential changes to the game remain possible as the league and players’ union embark on negotiatin­g a new collective bargaining agreement.

Manfred said rules changes the league might pursue would have a common goal of making the game more enjoyable for players, teams and fans.

What that means to each group, however, will undoubtedl­y differ.

Citing regulation of infield shifts as one example, Manfred characteri­zed potential proposals as a “restoratio­n” of the game’s historical style rather than a fundamenta­l change.

“What we play today doesn’t look all that much like 1971,” Manfred said. “The question is, which version would you like to get to? That’s the way I think about the difference­s.”

Clark also weighed in on how players might view such rules changes, though he didn’t reveal how the union might respond to specific ideas.

“Players are willing to talk about adjustment­s; players are willing to talk about the best ways to move the game forward,” Clark said. “Players are also interested in protecting the integrity of what the game has always been. That’s what they fell in love with and many folks have fallen in love with.”

CBA negotiatio­ns — Speaking of the CBA negotiatio­ns, neither Manfred nor

Clark revealed details about how the process was going less than five months before the current agreement was set to expire.

Manfred did downplay the notion that last year’s contentiou­s negotiatio­ns on how to stage the pandemic-shortened 2020 season would have some effect on the latest discussion between the sides.

“I think we have a very profession­al working relationsh­ip with the MLBPA,” Manfred said, adding: “Agreements get made or not made based on the substance of what’s out there. The fact we had a period of time, which we admittedly had last spring, where we had serious disagreeme­nts that became public I don’t think is really an indicator of whether you’re going to get a new agreement.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States