Lodi News-Sentinel

After divided review, origins of COVID-19 may never be known

- Michael Wilner

WASHINGTON — After a 90-day sprint for answers, U.S. intelligen­ce agencies remain divided over whether the coronaviru­s started from a lab-related incident or spread naturally from an animal to a human, and say the origins of the pandemic may never be known, according to an unclassifi­ed version of a report on the review.

The intelligen­ce community is united in the belief that the emergence of the coronaviru­s surprised Beijing in the winter of 2019, when it was first detected.

President Joe Biden ordered the threemonth probe in May, leading to a hunt by U.S. intelligen­ce agencies to solve one of the central questions of the pandemic.

A classified version of the report was submitted to the president on Tuesday. Leadership and oversight committees in Congress have also been briefed.

The unclassifi­ed report states that COVID-19 initially likely emerged in infected humans in small-scale exposure incidents starting no later than November 2019, and that the first major clusters occurred in Wuhan, China, a month later.

Four agencies within the intelligen­ce community, and the National Intelligen­ce Council, came to a low-confidence assessment that the virus most likely spread naturally from animals. One agency assessed with moderate confidence that it was more likely the result of a laboratory incident.

All parts of the intelligen­ce community came to broad agreement that the coronaviru­s disease known as SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon, and that Chinese officials did not have foreknowle­dge of the virus before it emerged in the population, the report says.

They also agree, with a low level of confidence, that it is unlikely the virus was geneticall­y engineered.

Intelligen­ce agencies also agreed that China’s cooperatio­n most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins — an unlikely outcome, the report says, with agencies concluding

that China itself is uncertain about where a thorough investigat­ion might lead.

Agencies operating under the Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce consulted throughout the 90-day period with outside academic experts, and brought an epidemiolo­gist into the National Intelligen­ce Council to vet their theories.

Members of Congress will receive a classified briefing on the intelligen­ce findings.

Scientists originally believed the pandemic virus most likely jumped naturally from an animal to humans in late 2019. But informatio­n emerged that raised the alternativ­e as a possibilit­y.

Three scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which conducts research on coronaviru­ses, were hospitaliz­ed with an illness that baffled and alarmed experts in November 2019.

The following month, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention moved to a new location in Wuhan near a wet market that experience­d the first known outbreak. Videos released by Chinese state-run media that month show Chinese CDC scientists capturing bats in caves without full protective equipment.

The World Health Organizati­on has been conducting its own review into the origins of COVID-19, but the probe has stalled, with the Chinese government refusing to provide raw data on the virus’s initial spread in Wuhan.

China has also rejected a proposal by WHO to expand its inquiry into lab activity in Wuhan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States