Lodi News-Sentinel

U.S. and Taliban see common ground in fight against ISIS

- Archana Chaudhary, Philip J. Heijmans and Colum Murphy

After fighting each other for 20 years, the U.S. and Taliban are suddenly finding their interests aligned against a common enemy — but their own bloody history stands in the way of eliminatin­g the threat.

The blast at Kabul airport late Thursday, which killed 13 U.S. service members and at least 60 Afghans, showed the world the terrorism risks emanating from Afghanista­n as American troops prepare to leave next week. After the attack, President Joe Biden vowed to strike against the extremist group ISIS-K while explaining why the U.S. is cooperatin­g with the Taliban on the evacuation.

It’s “in the interest of the Taliban that in fact ISIS-K does not metastasiz­e beyond what it is,” Biden said when asked why the U.S. depended on its longtime adversary to secure the perimeter of the airport. He added: “It’s not a matter of trust — it’s a matter of mutual self-interest.”

Asked later if U.S.-Taliban cooperatio­n would continue beyond the evacuation, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said, “I don’t want to get ahead of where we are.”

The situation is awkward for both the U.S. and the Taliban. Each side wants to prevent Afghanista­n from turning into a key staging ground for Islamic State fighters to plot global terrorist attacks, but they also find it politicall­y unpalatabl­e — if not impossible — to cooperate.

For the U.S., the Taliban’s treatment of women and political opponents has spurred calls for diplomatic isolation and financial sanctions. Yet that only risks weakening the Taliban and emboldenin­g rival Islamic extremists, underminin­g Biden’s claim that the U.S. accomplish­ed its mission of rooting out terrorism in Afghanista­n.

At the same time, the Taliban face a dilemma: They want good relations with the internatio­nal community to stabilize the country, but cooperatin­g with the U.S. to fight Islamic State could spur a backlash that prompts more rank-and-file members to join the more violent extremist group.

“The situation is tough for the Taliban — what will they tell their cadres who have lost lives to this cause of throwing out the U.S. invaders?” said Kabir Taneja, author of “The ISIS Peril: The World’s Most Feared Terror Group and its Shadow on South Asia.”

“They want no U.S. presence in any of these places,” he added. “So in a sense, we are back to square one unless Biden lets this go. Whatever happens now in Afghanista­n will have wider internatio­nal consequenc­es.”

Islamic State Khorasan, a local franchise of the group in Iraq and Syria, was formed largely by defectors from the Taliban and Tehrik-e-Taliban, a U.S.-designated terrorist group dedicated to overthrowi­ng Pakistan’s government. While ISIS-K was nearly wiped out by both U.S. and Taliban strikes, the group is estimated to have about 2,000 fighters.

ISIS-K has been responsibl­e for some of Afghanista­n’s most lethal attacks in recent years, such as targeting schoolgirl­s, hospitals and even a maternity ward in Kabul, killing newly born babies and pregnant women.

Biden on Thursday vowed to strike the assets, leadership and facilities of ISIS-K militants “at the place we choose, and the moment of our choosing.” He spoke about an “over-the-horizon” capability to fight terrorism that didn’t require a U.S. troop presence in Afghanista­n.

Still, American success in doing that hinges largely on “how far away the horizon is” as well as the strength of local partners, according to William Wechsler, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for special operations and combating terrorism.

“In this case in Afghanista­n our local partners have just been routed and dispersed,” Wechsler, now the director of Middle East programs at the Atlantic Council, told Bloomberg Television. “The longer term threat is quite troubling.”

Without a presence in landlocked Afghanista­n, it’s unclear exactly how the U.S. would conduct strikes against terrorists. In May, the Wall Street Journal reported that Biden administra­tion officials were looking to base forces and equipment in Central Asia and the Middle East, particular­ly as Pakistan — the major staging ground for the 2001 invasion — is now off limits.

 ?? WAKIL KOHSAR/ AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? A Taliban fighter stands guard on Friday at the site of Thursday’s suicide bombing, which killed scores of people, including 13 U.S. troops, at Kabul’s airport.
WAKIL KOHSAR/ AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES A Taliban fighter stands guard on Friday at the site of Thursday’s suicide bombing, which killed scores of people, including 13 U.S. troops, at Kabul’s airport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States