Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

NFL might need a Week 18

- SAM FARMER ON THE NFL

For nearly two months, the NFL tiptoed through the COVID-19 pandemic virtually unscathed.

Last week, the reality of the virus landed with an ominous thud.

Multiple positive tests among players forced the league to postpone two of Sunday’s marquee games: Pittsburgh at Tennessee, both undefeated, and New England at Kansas City, a showdown between the last two Super Bowl winners.

Patriots-Chiefs is tentativel­y scheduled for Monday or Tuesday night, although that was the original contingenc­y plan for SteelersTi­tans before that game was rebooked for Oct. 25.

Players from New England and Kansas City tested positive, an announceme­nt made Saturday morning, reportedly among them Patriots quarterbac­k Cam Newton.

“In consultati­on with infectious disease experts, both clubs are working closely with the NFL and the NFLPA to evaluate multiple close contacts, perform additional testing and monitor developmen­ts,” the league said in a statement. “All decisions will be made with the health and safety of players, team and gameday personnel as our primary considerat­ion.”

Multiple reports Saturday said Chiefs practice squad quarterbac­k Jordan Ta’amu tested positive.

There also were three more positive tests among the Titans on Saturday, bringing the total to 16 — eight players and eight other employees.

It’s conceivabl­e the scope of that outbreak could jeopardize Tennessee’s Week 5 home game against Buffalo.

According to reports, these Tennessee players have tested positive: Defensive lineman DaQuan Jones, long snapper Beau Brinkley, practice squad tight end Tommy Hudson, outside linebacker Kamalei Correa, cornerback Kristian Fulton, practice squad cornerback Greg Mabin, and receivers Adam Humphries and Cam Batson.

There’s a high likelihood this isn’t the last time games will be disrupted by the virus.

The silver lining for the league is that this reshufflin­g is happening before teams have had their week off. If there are outbreaks later in the season, it will be much more complicate­d to reconfigur­e the schedule.

These situations also move the NFL one step closer to tacking an 18th week onto the regularsea­son schedule, one designated for makeup games.

It’s easy enough to bump back the start of the playoffs by a week, and eliminate the week off between the championsh­ip games and the Super Bowl.

For that matter, moving the Super Bowl wouldn’t be nearly as complicate­d as in a normal year, because there’s no guarantee there would be spectators there, anyway. So blocking off sufficient hotel rooms in Tampa wouldn’t be such an ordeal.

If a playoff-bound team completed its 16 games as now scheduled, an 18th week would provide that team a week off before the postseason. An extra week also would afford the NFL time to establish a bubble for the postseason and sequester the playoff teams.

This season, only the No. 1 seed in each conference is awarded a week off at the start of the playoffs, as opposed to prior years when the top two NFC and AFC teams got weeks off.

So if there were an 18th week, the No. 1 seeds would get two weeks off after the season — providing they didn’t have games to make up.

Would the NFL tack on an 18th week if there were only a few makeup games that were inconseque­ntial to the postseason picture? Probably not. With so much swirling uncertaint­y, however, the NFL is keeping all options on the table.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States