Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

LETHEM SURVIVES THE JONATHAN ERA

THE BROOKLYN-BRED, SOCAL-RESIDING FORMER TRENDSETTE­R TAKES THE LONG VIEW IN LIFE AND IN HIS NEW NOVEL TOO

- BY CHARLES FINCH

THE JONATHANS! Suddenly it seems like a long time ago. They arrived between 1995 and 2005, novelists tasked with relieving the graying Roth and Updike as our frontline reporters from the psyche of the American male. It was a job we were sure would last forever.

It helped but was not essential to be named Jonathan. Joshua Ferris and Jeffrey Eugenides and Junot Díaz — all Jonathans, and maybe even Jennifer Egan too. And that just puts us clear of the letter J.

It was a classifica­tion at once mindless and perceptive. As the Jonathans sailed to black-tie literary fame, a different world was quietly cracking open behind them, in which the roads to mainstream success as a novelist were not mapped primarily through affluent, melancholy whiteness. Even if you liked some or all of the writers individual­ly, the nickname had a nicely fed-up feel. It was a coincidenc­e that so many of the best rising novelists were called Jonathan; simultaneo­usly, it was no coincidenc­e at all.

“It was just funny,” Jonathan Lethem said recently. “After so many efforts not to be pigeonhole­d or categorize­d, it was a perfect form of humbling.”

He paused, perhaps reconsider­ing how funny it really was, and added, “It was the very stupidest identifica­tion you could ever have.”

Lethem, 56 now and the author of a new novel, “The Arrest,” was and to some extent remains the Jonathan most closely identified with the most Jonathan of places, Brooklyn. His pacy, cerebral private-eye novel “Motherless Brooklyn” brought him wide notice and its 2003 followup, “The Fortress of Solitude,” a decades-spanning comic book Brooklyn fantasia, briefly made him one of the most ubiquitous novelists in America. Both are distinctiv­ely novels of the city, and readers may have been given the mistaken impression that it was Lethem’s only subject. But he has always been a wide-ranging writer. An editor whose opinion I regard highly told me she most admires “Amnesia Moon” and “Girl in Landscape,” the books that directly preceded the author’s most famous ones. They are both post-apocalypti­c novels, early contempora­ry inspiratio­ns for that indomitabl­e trend.

They are also thus forebears of “The Arrest,” another of Lethem’s post-apocalypti­c earth operas, as I started to think of them (more or less a space opera without space). In Lethem’s words, the novel is about “this incredibly soft collapse, where organic farmers run the world.” Its protagonis­t, Journeyman, is fortunate enough to have a sister who’s one of those farmers, and they’re living peaceably in the afterworld until Journeyman’s old, skeevy Hollywood running buddy Peter Todbaum appears in a monstrous armored vehicle, looking to settle scores.

Since 2011, Lethem has been the Roy E. Disney Professor in Creative Writing at Pomona College, a position everyone I spoke to, including Lethem, was at pains to point out had previously been occupied by David Foster Wallace. (Wallace, typically, was always near the Jonathans without seeming exactly like one of them.) He has a wife, children — they are in a hardcore Beatles phase — and mortgages on either coast, including one in Maine, not far from the setting of “The Arrest.” One question implicit in the new novel is how many people will get to lead this burgher’s life before it’s taken away.

IT ISN’T MYSTERIOUS why stability might appeal to Lethem. He grew up in Brooklyn, the son of a modernist painter (his father) and a passionate activist (his mother), a red diaper baby, the turbulence of politics traced into his earliest memories. Like so many artists of his generation, in adolescenc­e he found a post-hippie sanctuary in the bedroom, specifical­ly in what might once have been deemed nerd culture but is now just culture, reading scads of genre fiction and comic books. He has written about seeing “Star Wars” more than 20 times in a theater when he was 13.

After a spell at Bennington College, Lethem spent much of his 20s working at bookstores across Berkeley, which per maps made available to The Times is literally all the way across the country from Brooklyn. At the same time his stylish, exciting, inventive fiction was good enough that it drew the attention of other writers on the West Coast.

“He was publishing short stories in the science fiction magazines, and they were good,” recalled Kim Stanley Robinson, who met Lethem at Ursula Le Guin’s house in Napa Valley. Robinson is now regarded in many circles as America’s foremost living science fiction novelist. Karen Joy Fowler, another novelist who has successful­ly toggled between sci-fi and literary fiction, was also impressed. “He was really steeped in mystery novels, ’40s pulp fiction, while also being an intensely literary guy. He was a very gracious person.”

Lethem expected to be the kind of paperback writer who’d be discovered late, if at all; instead, his first few novels made him, in Robinson’s descriptio­n, a “star.” He moved back to Brooklyn just as the borough surged into consciousn­ess as an artistic frontierla­nd and in short order became one of its most famous inhabitant­s.

THE BOOK is a postapocal­yptic earth opera about “this incredibly soft collapse, where organic farmers run the world.”

THERE WAS someNew York [crap],” Lethem says. In conversati­on Lethem is nervily entertaini­ng, exceptiona­lly bright. He speaks in the practiced sentences of a professor, i.e., in thoughts to which much thought has been given but long ago. Trying to shake him out of that register is difficult.

When he talks about Brooklyn, however, he sounds less assured, a bit like someone who inadverten­tly timed the tech bubble exactly right, staggering out of the market much richer but slightly bewildered. There’s a serious randomness governing which writers become famous, and famous writers often sound conflicted about that, disavowing or disputing some of the details of their breakthrou­gh without (understand­ably) being willing to relinquish the basic validity of it having happened.

Lethem has one of the most elegant responses to this conundrum that I have heard: “The eccentrici­ties of my project ultimately prevailed,” he says, “over the idea that I was supposed to be … whatever it would be … serially failing at the great American novel, which is the only thing you can do with it.”

In fact he does seem to have tried that for a while, producing doorstop novels like “Chronic City” and “Dissident Gardens.” But recently he has reverted toward more conspicuou­s genre pieces: his previous novel “The Feral Detective” reads like acid-soaked Ross Thomas, and “The Arrest” candidly rests on long, intricate lines of descent through fantasy and sci-fi.

It’s a wonderful read, the writing gracefully gonzo, the emotional beats often unexpected yet quite right. Lethem doesn’t possess every novelistic gift equally (“I gave up on him when he named a character Perkus Tooth,” the critic John Self said, and it’s true that un-cartoonish characters are not his strength). But his work has become genuinely

 ?? Photograph­s by Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times ??
Photograph­s by Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States