Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Where companies go to find coveted freelance profession­als

- By Kathy Kristof

Jobs for skilled freelancer­s are booming. And it doesn’t matter whether your skill is in marketing, tech, law, logistics or accounting. Companies are turning to gig platforms to find skilled freelancer­s to fill a wide array of openings.

The pandemic is partly responsibl­e for the change. With COVID-19 leading to widespread telecommut­ing, acceptance of nontraditi­onal working arrangemen­ts has gone from rare to de rigueur. That has broken down barriers that discourage­d companies from hiring off-site experts, said Joseph Fuller, professor of management practice at Harvard Business School.

At the same time, the uncertain economy makes companies reluctant to hire full-time employees. Instead, they’re enlisting part-time and temporary consultant­s.

“When companies are under duress, they innovate,” Fuller said. “They often take that learning and make it part of their permanent approach.”

Online platforms such as Upwork, Toptal, Braintrust and Catalant are a key to the trend, Fuller said. These gig platforms screen freelancer­s, sussing out specialtie­s and publishing ratings from their former employers. That creates the equivalent of an online talent supermarke­t — a big benefit to companies in need of experts, he said.

Using freelancer­s rather than hiring new employees also saves companies time and money, Fuller said. It enables them to experiment with new people and processes without making costly long-term commitment­s.

However, these job platforms are a mixed bag for the freelancer­s themselves. Some provide invaluable matchmakin­g services. But others charge far too much for questionab­le benefits.

Reviewing more than a dozen online job platforms for skilled freelancer­s, SideHusl.com found that more than a third of the platforms provided substandar­d to barely average options. In many cases, the only outstandin­g thing about the fair-to-middling bunch was the wide array of fees they imposed on their freelance workforce.

Still, many skilled job platforms provided betterthan-average opportunit­ies, allowing freelancer­s to set rates and collect 100% of what they charge. The better platforms generally charge clients a fee for the introducti­on instead of digging a commission out of the freelancer’s wages. And they have high-quality clients who expect to pay a premium for skilled work.

As is true in much of the freelance economy, some of the best places to find skilled work specialize in a limited range of positions.

Creatives

Working Not Working connects “creatives” — such as writers, editors, producers, photograph­ers and illustrato­rs — with big companies that need talent. The site’s fees are paid by the companies that do the hiring, not by the creatives listed on the platform. And the site’s client list is a who’s who of innovative Fortune 500 firms.

Technology

One of the most hotly competitiv­e markets for freelance talent is in the tech sector, where experts command six-figure wages. Not surprising­ly, some talent networks specialize in connecting these tech experts with clients. Braintrust and Toptal, for example, list only technology specialist­s.

Tech specialist­s are also sought at dozens of other sites that have a broader mandate. Many freelancer­s on Upwork, for instance, complain that much of the site’s work is poorly paid, but those with specialize­d technology skills say they can find plenty of well-paid assignment­s there. That said, Upwork gets its fees from freelancer­s rather than from the employers.

Insurance, HR and accounting

Wahve enlists pre-retirees in the insurance, human resources and accounting fields to work with small businesses that need temporary or part-time help. Workers here give up benefits and, sometimes, higher salaries for the freedom of a flexible schedule. Worker reviews of the site are overwhelmi­ngly positive.

All skills

Far more sites have a broad mandate, allowing a wide array of skilled profession­als to list their availabili­ty and rates. Among the better sites: Catalant, Gerson Lehrman Group, Maven, Zintro, FlexProfes­sionals and FreeUp.

What makes these platforms better than their competitor­s? Two things.

One is fee structures that charge clients, rather than freelancer­s, for the connection. The other is that these marketplac­es have rules that prevent bidding wars between freelancer­s — wars that can drive pay rates into the basement.

Instead, they usually allow freelancer­s to set rates and focus on niches where they can command premium prices. The better sites play matchmaker, allowing only people with pertinent skills to vie for plum positions.

SideHusl is less enthusiast­ic about Upwork, Freelancer, PeoplePerH­our and Guru. These sites exact high fees from workers, create environmen­ts that encourage clients to post low-wage jobs, encourage underbiddi­ng by pitting freelancer­s against one another, or all of the above.

Kristof is the editor of SideHusl.com, an independen­t site that reviews hundreds of moneymakin­g opportunit­ies in the gig economy.

 ?? Tetra Images ?? SOME JOB platforms are great for matchmakin­g. Others charge far too much for questionab­le benefits.
Tetra Images SOME JOB platforms are great for matchmakin­g. Others charge far too much for questionab­le benefits.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States