Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

San Diego may lift ban on tribal land growth

- BY LAUREN J. MAPP Mapp writes for the San Diego Union-Tribune.

San Diego County for more than two decades has prohibited the region’s 18 tribes from expanding their reservatio­ns. That ban, which was put into place when casino operations were proliferat­ing at the turn of the century, could soon be lifted.

County Supervisor­s Jim Desmond and Nora Vargas will propose Wednesday that the county repeal previously approved resolution­s stifling tribal growth.

As part of the action, it would remove a blanket opposition to tribes processing so-called fee-to-trust applicatio­ns, which transfer land purchased by tribes or tribal members to a trust under the U.S. government, allowing tribes, instead of the county, to govern and benefit from that land.

Wednesday’s proposal would also scale back the current strict requiremen­ts for tribes to obtain liquor licenses, and it would establish a tribal liaison to strengthen the relationsh­ip between the county and each of the region’s tribal government­s.

The Bureau of Indian Affairs fee-to-trust process supports tribes’ rights to self-determinat­ion, according to the U.S. Department of the Interior. Many federal programs and services to support tribal members are available only on reservatio­ns or trust lands.

Trust acquisitio­ns allow tribes to develop the land they purchase as housing for tribal members, to access and use natural resources, and to build energy developmen­ts.

“This is very important not only for the tribal government­s but also for San Diego County and the collaborat­ion that it brings here today,” Desmond said.

The current policy of a blanket opposition to tribal growth in the county has been in place since the mid-1990s, Desmond said, and cases have not been considered individual­ly based on their merits.

In November 2000, county supervisor­s voted to oppose tribes’ efforts to expand in response to a surge in “casino constructi­on, accompanie­d by what they considered inadequate mitigation of off-site impacts,” the San Diego UnionTribu­ne reported the following year.

Desmond said this policy “led to distrust between tribal government­s and county government, and an overall lack of collaborat­ion and unity.”

With its 18 tribal government­s, San Diego is home to the greatest number of tribes of any U.S. county. There are 10 tribal casinos throughout the county, as well as other tribe-owned businesses, such as gas stations and a brewery.

These businesses are the main source of income for tribal government­s and also provide job opportunit­ies.

“These tribes have proven to be good neighbors with their commercial endeavors — they’re part of the economic engine of our region,” Desmond said. “Collective­ly, they’ve created over 10,000 jobs for San Diego County residents, resulting in an over $1-billion-a-year industry.

“For too long, the county of San Diego has opposed the growth of tribal government­s.”

Desmond was joined by tribal leaders, several of whom spoke during the news conference in support of the proposal.

Jamul Indian Village Chairwoman Erica M. Pinto said her tribe had submitted a land trust applicatio­n in 2012 that was opposed by the Board of Supervisor­s, preventing the tribe from expanding the reservatio­n. Currently, the tribe has only 6 acres of land where its casino was built, and no housing has been built for the tribe’s 72 members.

“We’re expanding, our members are growing, and we need that land,” Pinto said. “We need homes — we’re scattered throughout San Diego County, which we love the county because it’s all Kumeyaay territory, but we want to come back and be together.”

Jamul Indian Village has a current land in trust applicatio­n for a historical cemetery on a 2.34-acre parcel that was returned to the tribe in 2017 by the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego, Pinto said. But the applicatio­n is still pending approval.

Cody Martinez, chairman of the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, said the tribe has worked over the years to expand its reservatio­n from 640 acres to more than 2,000 acres but has spent millions of dollars through a dozen fee-to-trust applicatio­ns to do so. One of the largest acquisitio­ns, for the Sloan Canyon parcel, cost more than $20 million.

Passage of this resolution would make the pathway to acquiring land in trust easier and cheaper for local tribes.

“Currently, with their blanket opposition, it creates a lot of hurdles, and it takes years and hundreds of thousands of dollars to pursue a fee-to-trust policy,” Martinez said. “The tribe has invested millions of dollars for the land that was historical­ly ours anyway.”

Rincon Band of Luiseno Chairman Bo Mazzetti said because tribal government­s are not subdivisio­ns of state or local government­s, they should have a strong relationsh­ip with the county.

“For the county to sit down and recognize this and work with us, I applaud this first step,” Mazzetti said. “We look forward to working with the county. We have done a lot for this county that folks need to be aware of, and in the future, hopefully we’ll do a better job at letting folks know how we’re really providing economic stability, economic increases, safety and health issues we are addressing for our surroundin­g communitie­s.”

Pinto hopes the Board of Supervisor­s approves the proposal, anticipati­ng a better relationsh­ip between the tribal and county government­s.

“I think it’s going to be a very positive, lasting, collaborat­ive relationsh­ip — it hasn’t been that in the past, and I think this is a step in the right direction, and this is just the beginning,” Pinto said. “We’re stronger together.”

 ?? Sandy Huffaker For The SDU-T ?? TRIBAL LEADER Erica M. Pinto supports a repeal of resolution­s that stif le tribal growth.
Sandy Huffaker For The SDU-T TRIBAL LEADER Erica M. Pinto supports a repeal of resolution­s that stif le tribal growth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States