Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Which IRA is better for young workers?

- By Liz Weston

My mid-20s nephews and I discussed financial planning for them. After recommendi­ng they check with their employers for a 401(k) or equivalent program, we spoke about traditiona­l versus Roth IRAs. Would younger investors benefit more from a Roth IRA because the length of time the money would be invested is so long that the eventual tax-free withdrawal of the earnings outweighs the initial tax benefits of a traditiona­l IRA? At this time, we cannot determine if my nephews will have a higher tax rate post-retirement than now.

Answer: The usual advice has been that people should contribute to a Roth IRA rather than a traditiona­l IRA if they expect to be in the same or higher tax brackets in retirement. (Contributi­ons to Roths are not tax-deductible but withdrawal­s in retirement are tax-free. By contrast, contributi­ons to traditiona­l IRAs are often deductible, but withdrawal­s are taxed as income in retirement.)

Of course, you can’t predict future tax rates with any certainty. But it’s a pretty good bet that 20-somethings who are at the beginning of their careers will earn more — and thus face higher tax rates — down the road. In other words, your nephews’ current tax rates may be the lowest they’ll ever be. Your nephews may not get much benefit from a tax deduction now but could get huge benefits from tax-free withdrawal­s in the future.

Also, premature withdrawal­s from traditiona­l IRAs are usually taxed and penalized, but you can always withdraw the amount you contribute to a Roth without paying taxes or penalties. That flexibilit­y often appeals to young people who worry about “locking up” their money or who don’t yet have a substantia­l emergency fund.

Social Security is insurance

Dear Liz: My wife was 69 at the time of her passing. She was still working and not collecting Social Security. I am 72, retired and collecting Social Security. When I spoke with Social Security, I was told that I cannot collect on my wife’s Social Security. All I qualify for is a $255 death benefit. I asked what happened to her money that was collected all these years; I was told it goes into a general fund. Is there anything I can get from my wife’s Social Security?

Answer: If your current benefit is larger than the survivor benefit you would get based on her work record, then no.

Your question illustrate­s two common misconcept­ions about Social Security.

Social Security is not a 401(k) or other retirement fund that you pay into over time and then draw from in retirement. Social Security is actually insurance. (Social Security’s formal name is Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance.) It’s a payas-you-go system in which the payroll taxes collected from current workers pay for the benefits received by people who are retired or disabled and their dependents.

The other misconcept­ion is that survivors are qualified for additional benefits on top of their own. In fact, survivors get the larger of the two benefits a couple were receiving — not both. This is often a surprise to widows and widowers who see their incomes plunge after their partners die.

Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist for NerdWallet. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the “Contact” form at asklizwest­on.com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States