Los Angeles Times (Sunday)

Why won’t Feinstein retire?

-

Re “Feinstein continues to vote as details of recent illness emerge,” May 19

The hubris of everyone involved in allowing Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California to continue serving in the U.S. Senate boggles the mind.

My mother suffered with dementia — not related to encephalit­is, which Feinstein reportedly had as a complicati­on from shingles, but dementia neverthele­ss.

I have great compassion for anyone suffering from any kind of diminution of mental capacity. When it was beyond clear that my mom didn’t have the brain power to serve as a co-trustee of my family’s estate, my father appointed a new trustee.

If Feinstein does not even know that she has been gone from the Senate for months — as The Times’ own reporting makes clear — then please, it’s time to relieve Feinstein and select a new senator.

Now.

Mitzi Schwarz Los Angeles

As a daily reader of The Times since 1982, I feel that your reports and opinions regarding Feinstein’s health lack facts essential to understand­ing her position. In fact, they obscure the real issue with hearsay and sidebar speculatio­n.

To wit: Feinstein knows Republican­s will block a Democrat from replacing her on the Senate Judiciary Committee, thereby obstructin­g President Biden’s judicial appointmen­ts meant to moderate a federal judiciary packed by his predecesso­r with radicals.

That is the issue — a fascist takeover, not age, senility, selfishnes­s or Gov. Gavin Newsom’s promise to appoint a Black woman. Cries to resign play into the Republican agenda to force a resignatio­n.

Instead, as the wolves circle, Feinstein and her able staff have once again put the country’s well-being before her own, discreetly and strategica­lly keeping her seat and casting essential votes despite obvious discomfort.

God bless her for sticking around.

Pamela Horner

San Clemente

California voters elected Feinstein to serve a six-year term ending January 2025, so she has every right to finish. But, this situation would not happen if we had term limits.

The debate should not be about Feinstein or her personal health. The national debate should be whether we, as voters, should continue reelecting the same incumbents three and four times, in addition to systemic electoral reform — like a limit of two terms for U.S. senators.

I have served on appointed municipal commission­s, and I know from experience that when one person steps down, it encourages another to step up. Term limits could help with that, along with an electorate that does not vote based on simple name recognitio­n helped by incumbency. Aaron Kohrs Alexandria, Va.

This is truly a sad ending for Feinstein, who has undertaken an otherwise a stellar career.

In my reading, I have not been able to ascertain if Feinstein has ever received vaccinatio­n against shingles. Still, her current plight should be a teaching moment for those who have not been vaccinated against this disease.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that anyone over age 50 as well as those over age 19 with an immune-compromise­d condition receive two doses of Shingrix.

The vaccine is more than 90% effective in preventing shingles.

John T. Chiu, MD Newport Beach

 ?? Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times ?? SEN. DIANNE Feinstein (D-Calif.), with an aide, at a Senate Judiciary meeting on Thursday.
Kent Nishimura Los Angeles Times SEN. DIANNE Feinstein (D-Calif.), with an aide, at a Senate Judiciary meeting on Thursday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States