Los Angeles Times

Time to grow up, GOP

- JONAH GOLDBERG jgoldberg@latimes columnists.com

It’s hard for a lot of people, particular­ly on the right, to recognize that the conservati­ve movement’s problems are mostly problems of success. The Republican Party’s problems are much more recognizab­le as the problems of failure, including the failure to recognize the limits of that movement’s success.

American conservati­sm began as a kind of intellectu­al hobbyist’s group with little hope of changing the broader society. Albert Jay Nock, the cape-wearing libertaria­n intellectu­al — he called himself a “philosophi­cal anarchist” — who inspired a very young William F. Buckley Jr., argued that political change was impossible because the masses were rubes, goons, fools or sheep, victims of the eternal tendency of the powerful to exploit the powerless.

Buckley, who rightly admired Nock for many things, rightly disagreed on this point. Buckley trusted the people more than the intellectu­als. Moreover, as Buckley’s friend Richard Weaver said, “ideas have consequenc­es” and, consequent­ly, it is possible to rally the public to your cause.

It took time. In an age when conservati­ve books make millions, it’s hard to imagine how difficult it once was get a right-ofcenter book published. Henry L. Regnery, the founder of the publishing house that bears his name, started his venture to break the wall of groupthink censorship surroundin­g the publishing industry. With a few exceptions, Regnery was the only game in town for decades.

That’s hardly the case anymore. While there’s a higher bar for conservati­ve authors at mainstream publishers (which remain overwhelmi­ngly liberal), profit tends to trump ideology.

And publishing is a lagging indicator. In cable news, think tanks, talk radio and, of course, the Internet, conservati­ves have at least rough parity with, and often superiorit­y to, liberals. It’s only in the legacy institutio­ns — newspapers, the broadcast networks and most especially academia and Hollywood — where conservati­sm is still largely frozen out. Nonetheles­s, conservati­sm is a mass-market enterprise these days, for good and for ill.

The good is obvious. The ill is less understood. For starters, the movement has an unhealthy share of hucksters eager to make money from stirring rage, paranoia and an ill-defined sense of betrayal with little concern for the real political success that can only come with persuading the unconverte­d.

A conservati­ve journalist or activist can now make a decent living while never once bothering to persuade a liberal. Worse, it’s possible to be a conservati­ve without once being exposed to a good liberal argument. Liberals lived in such an ideologica­l cocoon for decades, which is one reason conservati­ves won so many arguments early on. Having the right emulate that echo chamber helps no one.

Ironically, the institutio­n in which conservati­ves had their greatest success is the one most besieged by conservati­ves today: the Republican Party. To listen to many grass-roots conservati­ves, the GOP establishm­ent is a cabal of weak-kneed sellouts who regularly light votive candles to a poster of liberal Republican icon Nelson Rockefelle­r.

This is not only not true, it’s a destructiv­e myth. The Rockefelle­r Republican­s were purged from the GOP decades ago. Their high-water mark was in 1960, when the Goldwater insurgency was temporaril­y crushed. Richard Nixon agreed to run on a platform all but dictated by Rockefelle­r and to tap Rockefelle­r’s minion Henry Cabot Lodge as his running mate. When the forebears of today’s tea partyers threatened to stay home or bolt the party in 1960, Sen. Barry Goldwater proclaimed, “Let’s grow up, conservati­ves!”

It’s still good advice. It’s not that the GOP isn’t conservati­ve enough, it’s that it isn’t tactically smart or persuasive enough to move the rest of the nation in a more conservati­ve direction. Moreover, thanks in part to the myth that all that stands between conservati­ves and total victory is a philosophi­cally pure GOP, party leaders suffer from a debilitati­ng lack of trust — some of it well earned — from the rank and file.

But politics is about persuasion, and a party consumed by the need to prove its purity to its base is going to have a very hard time proving anything else to the rest of the country.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States