Los Angeles Times

Classic ‘ growth’ stocks lag in bull run

- By Tom Petruno business@latimes.com

When investors think of “growth” stocks, some classic American names usually come to mind: Coca- Cola Co., Wal- Mart Stores Inc., McDonald’sCorp., Procter& Gamble Co.

But many of those classics have taken aback seat in the bull market’s advance over the last three years. That could spell opportunit­y for investors who still believe these mega- companies have strong long- term prospects, despite the head winds many of them face.

David Kathman, an analyst at investment research firm Morning star Inc. in Chicago, recently looked at the 2013 and 2014 performanc­e records of mutual funds that own big- name stocks.

“Left behind the past few years have been many funds focusing on ‘ quality’ stocks, generally defined as those that are highly profitable, generate a lot of cash and have strong balance sheets,” Kathman said.

The Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund, forexample, is up 5.7% year to date, trailing the 8.1% advance of the Standard& Poor’s 500i ndex, including dividends. The Vanguard fund’s 25 largest holdings include Wal- Mart, P& Gand McDonald’s.

In the three years that ended Sept. 30, Wal- Mart was up a total of 59%, P& G gained 46% and McDonald’s returned a mere 19%. All three lagged far behind the S& P 500, which gained 86% in the period.

Many of the giants are facing tough challenges.

Wal- Mart is dependent on millions of families at the bottom of the income rung, and so has been pinched by its customers’ financial struggles. P& G has seen many of its consumer product brands lose market share to new competitor­s. McDonald’s has been hit by a consumer backlash against fast food in general. And this year, the strong dollar means U. S. multinatio­nal companies’ foreign earnings may take a hit.

At the same time, Wall Street has been drawn to industries that have brighter profit growth prospects in the near term, including technology, heavy industry and healthcare.

Still, some analysts warn against underestim­ating the ability of the old- line growth stocks to produce healthy returns for shareholde­rs in the long run. All of the companies continue to have enormous clout in their markets, and their businesses generate huge amounts of cash. All pay above average dividends to shareholde­rs.

And they aren’t sitting still. P& G, for example, in August said it could sell about half of its global brands in the next two years to concentrat­e on 70 to 80 faster- growing core brands.

In the near term, many of the classic growth stocks don’t look like screaming bargains. Based on analysts’ consensus estimates of 2014 earnings per share, the price to-earnings ratio of Coke shares is 21. For McDonald’s it’s18, andforWal- Mart it’s15. The figure for the S& P 500 overall is about17.

But if the bull market wanes, these stocks are likely to attract investors who want both growth and relative safety.

“History shows that highqualit­y investment­s tend to win-out in the end, though it’s hard to predict exactly when the tide will turn,” Kathman said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States