Los Angeles Times

Cockpits, pilots and privacy

-

Re “No defense against pilot malice,” Opinion, March 30

In his opinion piece on the Germanwing­s crash, Peter Garrison writes, “From shortly after takeoff to shortly before touchdown, airplanes fly themselves while pilots talk with controller­s and one another and punch data into flight management systems.”

That is one of the most insulting, embarrassi­ng and misleading characteri­zations of how commercial airplanes are flown that I’ve ever read.

It is caricature­s like Garrison’s that are responsibl­e for much of the flying public’s vastly exaggerate­d sense of just how “automated” cockpits are, and for its misunderst­anding of what airline pilots actually do and how, in fact, we interface with cockpit technology.

Garrison is an experience­d pilot and should know better than to reinforce this pervasive mythology through such flip and misleading descriptio­ns.

Patrick Smith

Boston The writer, an airline pilot, is the author of “Cockpit Confidenti­al: Everything You Need to Know About Air Travel.”

In a world where pilotless drones can complete pinpoint bombing missions (or so we are told), it seems entirely possible that commercial airlines could be piloted remotely from facilities with multilayer­ed security procedures and real-time monitoring to prevent what appears to have happened in the Alps.

I think people would accept that.

David Weber

West Hollywood

Privacy is all very well, but if medical privacy leads to 150 people dying at the hands of a pilot who had “suicidal tendencies,” I surmise we need to rethink privacy.

Rory Johnston

Hollywood

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States