Los Angeles Times

Clarkson’s looking like a keeper, but at what price?

- By Eric Pincus and Mike Bresnahan mike.bresnahan@latimes.com Twitter: @Mike_Bresnahan Twitter: @EricPincus Bresnahan is a Times staff writer. Pincus is a Times correspond­ent.

Byron Scott stopped short of saying the Lakers needed to rebuild around Jordan Clarkson. It would have been a little extreme to say such a thing despite the season the rookie is having.

But the Lakers coach offered the second-round draft pick quite the compliment Friday, saying the Lakers needed to “add some pieces around him and let’s see what happens.”

Pretty heady stuff for a player who’s started only 32 NBA games, and whose contract expires after next season.

Clarkson was the 46th overall draft pick last June, putting him in a different salary structure than a firstround pick. He has a nonguarant­eed contract for next season at the league minimum for a second-year player ($845,059).

Then the Lakers will hold Clarkson’s “early Bird” rights, creating a complicate­d set of scenarios, four in all.

1) The first is simple, and unlikely. Clarkson could accept the team’s qualifying offer of up to $2.7 million for 2016-17 but would be a restricted free agent once again after that season.

2) The Lakers can re-sign Clarkson via his early Bird rights for up to four years and roughly $25 million. This option could help the Lakers preserve spending power for other free agents, but wouldn’t be as lucrative a choice for the player.

3) Clarkson can be brought back using the Lakers’ valuable cap space. A maximum contract for four years could amount to more than $95 million. In this scenario, Clarkson eats up roughly $22 million of the team’s spending power in 2016 — instead of the $2.7million qualifying offer. This path greatly limits the Lakers’ flexibilit­y in shopping for other players.

4) Because of a quirk in the rules, often referred to as the “Gilbert Arenas provision,” other franchises are limited to signing Clarkson as a restricted free agent to a four-year offer sheet as high as $57 million. The limitation on what other teams can offer Clarkson decidedly puts the Lakers in the driver’s seat, should re-signing him at a high dollar amount become the priority.

Whatever the decision with Clarkson, the timing is crucial as the franchise looks to reestablis­h itself as a power in the Western Conference.

Beat the Clippers?

The Lakers appear to be settling in as the NBA’s fourth-worst team, too far ahead of third-worst Philadelph­ia but comfortabl­y behind fifth-worst Orlando.

It’s meaningful because they lose their first-round pick if they fall below No. 5 at the May 19 lottery.

There’s another race, though, and it involves a second-round pick. And the Clippers.

The L.A. teams play each other Sunday and Tuesday, setting up a bizarre tug-ofwar among Lakers fans who want to see the Lakers keep losing to improve draft position.

The Lakers, via the Jeremy Lin trade with the Houston Rockets, will receive the Clippers’ second-round pick, but only if it falls exactly within the 51-55 range.

The Clippers have been on a recent winning streak and currently own the 56th pick.

In other words, a few more Clippers losses could benefit the Lakers.

 ?? Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ?? ROOKIE GUARD Jordan Clarkson, drafted in second round, has played his way into Lakers’ future plans.
Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ROOKIE GUARD Jordan Clarkson, drafted in second round, has played his way into Lakers’ future plans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States