Los Angeles Times

Iran talks tough, with a twist

Supreme leader calls for strict terms in a nuclear deal but hints at better ties with U.S.

- BY RAMIN MOSTAGHIM AND PAUL RICHTER

TEHRAN — Iran’s supreme leader on Thursday laid out tough terms for negotiatio­ns on his country’s nuclear program, saying that all sanctions must be lifted at the start of any agreement and that internatio­nal inspectors would not be permitted in military sites.

In his first public comments since a framework for a proposed accord was announced April 2, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei emphasized that he is not committed to any deal. He played down the importance of the details released last week.

“There has been nothing done, and there is nothing binding,” Khamenei said in a speech that was televised and distribute­d on his website.

At the same time, the speech included a surprising, although obscurely worded, line that some U.S. analysts viewed as a signal from Khamenei that a deal on the nuclear issue could open the way to greater cooperatio­n with the United States.

After a section of the speech in which he recounted what he saw as past U.S. misdeeds, Khamenei said that “if the counterpar­t stops its bad behavior, one could expand this experience to other issues.”

Although hardly a ringing endorsemen­t, the words may indicate a significan­t shift. Khamenei previously had insisted that a nuclear deal would not improve Iran’s overall ties with the U.S. Those statements have been aimed at hard-liners who fear a warming of relations that could jeopardize the ideology of the Islamic Republic.

The speech’s disparate elements — tough talk about terms along with a hint about a wider improvemen­t in relations — led analysts to see it as a signal that Iran’s leader wants the nuclear negotiatio­ns to succeed, but also wants to push the Obama administra­tion further on key issues, particular­ly a rapid easing of sanctions.

Iranian officials have promised the public that the nuclear talks would lead to noticeable improvemen­t in the country’s battered economy, and they are under pressure to deliver.

Iran will not sign any accord “unless all economic sanctions are totally lifted on the first day of the implementa­tion of any deal,” Khamenei insisted.

The Obama administra­tion and the five countries that are its negotiatin­g partners — Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia — are demanding that relief be delayed until at least six months after the Iranians begin implementi­ng the terms of a deal. They also want the sanctions lifted in phases as Iran follows through on its commitment­s to disable centrifuge­s, reduce its stockpile of enriched uranium and take other steps.

Khamenei “needs upfront relief to sell the deal in Iran,” said Cliff Kupchan, chairman of the Eurasia Group, a risk assessment consulting firm. The U.S. might be able to meet that need by allowing Iran to quickly begin selling a limited amount of oil or reconnecti­ng some of its banks to the internatio­nal financial system, he said.

The Iranian leader is holding out an incentive to the administra­tion, saying, “I realize the stakes here: Give me upfront sanctions relief, and the sky’s the limit,” Kupchan said. Khamenei’s remarks “should be viewed more as political jockeying than as setting hard, ‘killer’ red lines.”

Nonetheles­s, the tougher portions of the speech will almost certainly complicate the political task for President Obama and his aides. They already face strong opposition in Congress, influenced by criticism of the deal from Israeli leaders and nervousnes­s on the part of Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries that have been U.S. allies.

The speech immediatel­y raised concern in the U.S. about how many elements of the deal Khamenei may try to walk back during the negotiatio­ns leading up to the June 30 deadline for a final agreement.

In the speech, Khamenei also criticized the Saudis in uncharacte­ristically harsh terms for their 2-week-old military offensive against Iran-backed Houthi insurgents in Yemen. He described the Saudi government under newly installed King Salman as “inexperien­ced youngsters” who had replaced their predecesso­rs’ restraint with “barbarism.”

The nuclear negotiatio­ns are aimed at ensuring that Iran is not able to build an atomic weapon within the expected 10- to 15-year duration of the pact.

The bargaining involves an Iranian nuclear program that includes 19,000 centrifuge­s at two enrichment sites, the undergroun­d Fordow installati­on and the larger Natanz center. Iran also has a partially built heavy-water reactor at Arak, uranium mines and several research centers, some facilities dating to before 1979, when the Islamic Republic came into being.

Iran is believed to have spent $100 billion over decades on its nuclear infrastruc­ture. The government considers it a national treasure and even reformist leaders want it preserved.

Inspection­s of military sites, the second issue Khamenei raised, is politicall­y sensitive in both countries. In the U.S., opponents of the talks insist that Iran will try to cheat on any deal. Yet the Iranians are reluctant to allow inspection­s in their military bases because they suspect that the inspection­s are aimed in part at snooping on the capabiliti­es of their armed forces.

The Iranian Revolution­ary Guard Corps has been strongly opposed to opening up its bases, and Khamenei’s words may indicate that he is weighing in on its side.

The six world powers consider access to the bases crucial because some, such as the Parchin complex, may hold the key to whether Iran has sought to develop nuclear weapons. Other installati­ons on military bases, such as the Fordow site, are central to Iran’s nuclear program.

Khamenei’s unwillingn­ess to commit to a deal is consistent with the position he has taken since the talks began in earnest 18 months ago. He has emphasized that he supports the negotiatio­ns, yet has positioned himself so he can distance himself from the deal if it proves flawed or unpopular.

As he has before, Khamenei said he doesn’t trust U.S. officials and was “never very optimistic” that the talks would result in a deal.

He called U.S. public statements about the deal “flawed, incorrect and in contradict­ion to the facts.” And he expressed strong contempt for the U.S., describing it as “stubborn, deceitful, indecent and given to backstabbi­ng.”

Some analysts took Khamenei’s comments as a danger sign for the talks. Others contended that Khamenei was again laying down tough terms in hopes of helping Iranian negotiator­s in the bargaining.

Khamenei “knows very well that sanctions won’t be lifted immediatel­y,” said Alireza Nader, an Iran specialist at Rand Corp. “There’s a middle ground here and he’s trying to push the negotiatio­ns toward it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States