Los Angeles Times

Clinton can’t ride Obama’s wave

- JONAH GOLDBERG jgoldberg@latimescol­umnists.com

In news only slightly more surprising than this morning’s sunrise, Hillary Rodham Clinton announced she is running for president again. The announceme­nt came in the form of a clever video, in which Clinton says she wants to be a “champion” for “everyday Americans” — an obviously focusgroup­ed term intended to replace “middle class.” I like it, but unless they’re very careful, “everyday” has a condescend­ing tinge that could backfire (synonyms include: “dull,” “unexceptio­nal” and “commonplac­e”). One can already imagine a “Saturday Night Live” version of Clinton looking out the window of her private jet: “Wow, those everyday Americans look like ants down there.”

According to most pundits, what made the video clever was that it put people first. The bulk of it is a montage of “everyday Americans” talking about exciting developmen­ts in their own lives: a woman reentering the job market after being a stay-at-home mom; Latino brothers poised to start a business; a gay couple planning their wedding; an interracia­l couple excited about their move, etc. It ends with Clinton saying, “I’m getting ready to do something too. I’m running for president.”

See, she’s just like you, everyday Americans.

The people profiled are a visual checklist of Barack Obama’s “coalition of the ascendant” (Ron Brownstein’s phrase): young people, minorities, gays, college-educated whites, single working women, etc. As with pretty much everything Clinton does, that was carefully planned.

Most political pros agree that Clinton will need a huge turnout from the Obama coalition to win. The bad news is that, so far, the Obama coalition is like a nontransfe­rable, single-purpose coupon that can only be used to get Obama elected president. Clinton advocates insist we don’t know that yet, which is true. But all the evidence looks bad for Clinton.

After he was reelected, Obama turned his campaign operation, Organizing for America, into a de facto personal political party with the sole aim of mobilizing his coalition to support his agenda. In the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting, the newly renamed Organizing for Action made gun control a priority. Obama arguably set the bar for political success low, demanding a congressio­nal vote on his proposals — not actual passage. He made this appeal the emotional centerpiec­e in his 2013 State of the Union address. Organizing for Action manned the phones, took to the Twitterver­se, made a lot of noise on cable TV and … nothing happened.

The group’s other big priority: making Obamacare popular. That still hasn’t happened.

In every off-year and midterm election of his presidency, Obama tried very hard to rally his faithful for other candidates, including in the special election for the late Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat. Obama failed, often spectacula­rly. After losing the Senate in 2014, Obama petulantly said he heard the voters but added: “To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participat­e in the process yesterday, I hear you too.”

Whatever he meant by that, it was also an implicit concession that the Obama coalition isn’t a proletaria­n reserve army that can be mobilized at will, even by Obama.

The Clinton campaign has hired Obama’s image consultant­s in the hopes that they can do for her what they allegedly did for him. They’ve even tried to replicate Obama’s signature “O” logo into an exciting “H,” which mostly looks like a road sign pointing to the next exit for a hospital.

The inelegance seems amusingly symbolic. The letter “O” lends itself to graphic artistry, the letter “H,” not so much. It’s no surprise that consultant­s think consultant­s are very important. But turning Clinton into Obama (or Bill Clinton) is beyond their powers.

In 2008, the enthusiasm for Obama’s novel candidacy was self-evident and organic. His personal appeal was such that his handlers felt he could never be over-exposed.

Enthusiasm for Clinton’s longexpect­ed candidacy, while obviously sincere for many partisans, is more asserted than obvious. That’s why the smartest thing about Clinton’s announceme­nt video wasn’t the testimonia­ls from so many “everyday Americans.” It was that there was so little Hillary Clinton in it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States