Los Angeles Times

Finance blues

Even half at top levels say pay didn’t meet expectatio­ns or wasn’t fair, a survey finds.

- By Dean Starkman dean.starkman@latimes.com Twitter: @deanstarkm­an

At least half of those working in finance are unhappy in their job, a survey finds.

At least half of those working in finance are unhappy in their job, and half even at the highest levels said either their pay didn’t meet their expectatio­ns or they weren’t paid fairly, a new survey found.

The survey by the Options Group, a New Yorkbased executive search and consulting firm, found that only 20% of respondent­s were satisfied with all four key aspects of their working life: their job, the firm for which they worked, their pay and their prospects. Thirty percent were happy with two of the four factors. Fifty percent were happy with none of the factors.

“It’s time to move to other industries,” an unnamed sales executive at a European bank is quoted in the survey. “Banks are not dealing well with change and it will take a change of mind-set for business to thrive.”

The findings reflect anecdotal impression­s of analysts and others of widespread job dissatisfa­ction on Wall Street and the wider financial-services industry in the wake of the financial crisis of 2008, which saw a pullback in industry profits and compensati­on and tighter regulation imposed by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law and other measures.

Jessica Lee, an Options Group director, said the survey found that other factors besides pay — career prospects, the people with whom the respondent worked, etc. — were equally important in determinin­g job satisfacti­on, particular­ly when pay was below market.

“Those other things are really important,” she said. “If they’re not in line, and on top of that, the money’s not there, then you’re out the door.”

In one of the more surprising findings, only half at the top of financial firms, either at the executive or partner level, agreed that their pay and bonus met their expectatio­ns and was fair.

The dissatisfa­ction at the top was amplified further down the hierarchy. Only 39% of those with six to eight years’ experience agreed that their compensati­on was fair and was what they expected. Only 26% of those who do not receive bonuses as part of their compensati­on agreed their pay was fair.

Among the most satisfied with their compensati­on, the survey found, were “front office” employees — executives, traders, analysts, salespeopl­e, investment bankers and the like — at insurance companies, where 78% agreed that their compensati­on met expectatio­ns and was fair.

“Non-front office” employees — compliance officers, risk managers, human resources personnel — were less satisfied. Only 5% of back office employees at hedge funds agreed their compensati­on was fair and in line with expectatio­ns.

Despite the job satisfacti­on findings, more respondent­s reported that pay had increased rather than decreased. Among hedge-fund employees, for instance, 21% reported that their compensati­on had increased 30% or more in the last year, while only 9% reported their compensati­on had decreased 30% or more.

Data about compensati­on trends were captured in an electronic survey of finance industry profession­als that was conducted Jan. 29 to March 9 and received 3,100 responses.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States