Los Angeles Times

Agricultur­e: It’s worth the water

California’s economy is incredibly diverse, and agricultur­e is a key part of that diversity.

- By Karen Ross and Daniel Sumner Karen Ross is California agricultur­e secretary. Daniel Sumner is a professor of agricultur­al and resource economics at UC Davis.

Pundits here in droughtstr­icken California have become fond of proclaimin­g that farms consume 80% of the state’s water and generate only about 2% of its gross domestic product. “Why devote so much of our water to an industry that contribute­s so little fuel to our economic engine?” they ask.

Both of those figures are deceptive. It’s only possible to arrive at 80% by not accounting for the amount of water dedicated to environmen­tal uses. (For example, the water in rivers that flows into the sea.) And the 2% figure gros- sly undersells the importance of food grown in California.

California’s economy is incredibly diverse, much like its topography, its climate and its population. That’s a significan­t benefit when you’re the eighth-largest economy in the world. And agricultur­e is a key part of that diversity.

Of course, many aggregate sectors constitute a larger share of our economy than agricultur­e. Finance, insurance and real estate tops the list at 21%. Profession­al services and government follow at 13% and 12%, respective­ly.

Beyond those sectors, we have a broad, f lat grouping of several categories, each representi­ng just a few percent of the state’s GDP. That’s a remarkably balanced profile that lends resilience and dynamism to our economy.

Let’s look more closely at that data, though. Is agricultur­e really just 2.1%? As is so often the case with statistics, what’s not in that number is more significan­t than what is.

Take the “utilities” category, for instance. It includes power generated for farms and for processing and marketing crops once they’re harvested. The “real estate” piece includes sales and leasing of agricultur­al acreage and processing facilities. “Nondurable goods manufactur­ing” includes food and beverage processing. “Wholesale trade” and “retail trade” does not just mean the shopping mall; it includes the supermarke­t, the food court and the regional produce hub.

Categories such as “transporta­tion and warehousin­g” and “finance and insurance” are linked into every one of our 78,000 farms, each of which needs trucks, banks and insurance coverage to bring in the harvest.

“Accommodat­ion and food services” not only runs on food but also is fond of promoting the fact that many of the most healthful and desirable foods and beverages grow on California farms and ranches. California, after all, helped start the farm-to-plate movement, and it’s not an exaggerati­on to say that agricultur­e is tied to the state’s identity from harvest (Cesar Chavez) to table (Alice Waters).

Granted, all economic sectors have ripple effects and multiplier­s. But unlike most other segments, California’s agricultur­al productivi­ty and diversity are not readily duplicated elsewhere. Our soils and climate are what have made it possible for us to supply so much of our nation’s and the world’s food.

Food is central to California in more than just the nutritiona­l sense. It contribute­s to nearly every aspect of our economy and our lives, an important point to keep in mind as we weigh what our water is worth during this drought, and the next one.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States