Los Angeles Times

Ruling may close most abortion clinics in Texas

Law upheld in federal court also bans nearly all terminatio­ns after 20 weeks. Opponents plan to appeal to the Supreme Court.

- By James Queally james.queally@latimes.com Times staff writer Maria L. La Ganga contribute­d to this report.

A federal appeals panel upheld nearly all of the provisions of a Texas abortion law Tuesday that would force the closure of most of the state’s abortion clinics.

The ruling, which effectivel­y affirmed the 2013 passage of House Bill 2 by the Republican-dominated state Legislatur­e, puts all but seven or eight Texas clinics at risk of permanentl­y shutting, abortion rights advocates said, vowing to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“It’s a travesty that a state the size of Texas will only have eight safe, legal abortion clinics. The 5th Circuit has once again put their political ideology above the law,” Heather Busby, executive director of Pro-Choice Texas, said in a statement.

The wide-ranging House Bill 2 was designed to limit abortion access and restrict when they could be conducted. The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeal’s threemembe­r panel was unanimous in upholding the bill’s toughest provisions.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, in a statement, praised the court’s decision as a “vindicatio­n of the careful deliberati­on by the Texas Legislatur­e to craft a law to protect the health and safety of Texas women ... while protecting our most vulnerable — the unborn.”

Under the law’s provisions, nearly all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy are banned, except in cases of rape or incest with a minor; and abortion-inducing drugs must be administer­ed in the presence of a doctor, which would require most patients to visit clinics on three separate occasions.

In addition, doctors who perform abortions must have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic, and all clinics are required to have the same equipment and building requiremen­ts as ambulatory surgery centers, even if the clinics only administer oral antiaborti­on drugs.

The Supreme Court had said states may regulate the practice of abortion but should not put an “undue burden” on women seeking to end a pregnancy. With that guideline in mind, U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel last summer struck down the surgical center requiremen­ts statewide and the admitting privileges requiremen­t for two facilities.

Tuesday’s decision overturned Yeakel’s ruling, but the panel made an exception for a McAllen facility on the grounds that it is the only abortion facility in the area.

“Once again, women across the state of Texas face eliminatio­n of safe and legal options for ending a pregnancy, and the denial of their constituti­onal rights,” Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproducti­ve Rights, said in a statement. “The Supreme Court’s prior rulings do not allow for this kind of broadside legislativ­e assault on women’s rights and healthcare.”

Texas Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton, who championed the bill while he was a member of the state House of Representa­tives, said in a statement: “Abortion practition­ers should have no right to operate their businesses from substandar­d facilities and with doctors who lack admitting privileges at a hospital.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States