Los Angeles Times

A test for candidates

Responding to the Charleston attack provides the first defining moment for the presidenti­al field.

- By Kathleen Hennessey kathleen.hennessey@latimes.com

Remarks about the shooting tend to fall along party lines.

WASHINGTON — The tragic shooting in a Charleston, S.C., church has quickly become something of a Rorschach test for the crop of politician­s running for president, who are facing the first major national trauma of the campaign season.

What they sawin it— and what they said about it — spoke volumes about their politics.

In comments, Twitter messages and public statements, both Democrats and Republican­s moved quickly to their political comfort zones, emphasizin­g issues most likely to appeal to their core constituen­ts.

For Democrats, that largely meant decrying the apparent racial motivation­s of the shooter and reviving talk of gun control — although it remained unclear whether the gun regulation­s that Democrats have pushed in recent years would have prevented this particular crime.

Republican­s emphasized the religious elements of the crime — particular­ly the horrific nature of a shooting in a church, against people of faith.

On Saturday, however, former GOP presidenti­al nominee Mitt Romney increased the pressure on his fellow Republican­s to engage in the race debate by publicly calling upon South Carolina to remove the Confederat­e flag from its state Capitol grounds. In a tweet, he called the flag a “symbol of racial hatred.”

Republican Jeb Bush re- sponded with a Facebook post noting that in Florida, wherehe served as governor, the Confederat­e flag was moved “from the state grounds to a museum where it belonged.”

The candidate added: “Following a period of mourning, there will rightly be a discussion among leaders in the state about how South Carolina should move forward, and I’m confident they will do the right thing.”

Still, the distinct frames that Republican­s and Democrats put on the massacre in South Carolina demonstrat­ed the wide political divide between voters driving the still-nascent presidenti­al campaign.

Where one part of the political universe sees an attack on Christians, another sees a devastatin­g combinatio­n of racial hatred and easy access to weapons.

Speaking Friday to a group of religious conservati­ves gathered in Washington, Bush, who in response to the shooting canceled plans to campaign in South Carolina, noted that the attack tookplace “in a house of peace and brotherhoo­d,” where a well-known pastor was leading a prayer group.

“I don’t know what was on the mind or the heart of the man who committed these atrocious crimes,” Bush said. “But I do know what was in the heart of the victims. They were meeting in brotherhoo­d and sisterhood in that church. … They were praying.”

Bush made no reference to the victims’ race, although Dylann Roof, the white 21-year-old charged Friday with killing nine black people, made racist statements at the scene of the attack, witnesses said.

Other Republican­s have steered clear of talk about race or guns. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, speaking at the same Faith and Freedom Coalition conference Thursday, also emphasized religious faith, with a twist that was true to his libertaria­n leanings.

“What kind of person goes in a church and shoots nine people?” he asked. “There’s a sickness in our country; there’s something terribly wrong.

“But it isn’t going to be fixed by your government,” he said. “It’s people straying away. It’s people not understand­ing where salvation comes from. I think if we understand that, we’ll have better expectatio­ns of what to expect from government.”

Only Ben Carson, the one African American in the GOP field, came close to labeling the shooting as racially motivated.

“If we don’t pay close attention to the hatred and the division that’s going on in our nation, this is just a harbinger of what we can expect,” he said.

The contrast with Democrats was stark. Campaignin­g Thursday in Nevada, Hillary Rodham Clinton cited racism as part of the problem but stressed guncontrol as the primary solution to such violence.

“Let’s just cut to the chase,” she said in an interview with Nevada journalist Jon Ralston. “It’s guns, and we have to have a better balance. … So there’s a lot of fear, and I think if you stand up to that fear and you say, ‘Look, I’m speaking to lawabiding, reasonable people who don’t want guns in the hands of unbalanced people, felons, terrorists, we’ve got to do more.’”

In another speech Saturday, Clinton referred to the “deep fault line” of race in the U.S.

Former Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland, one of the Democrats trying to becomethe alternativ­e to Clinton, went further. In an email to supporters, he tried to tap into outrage over the failed effort to pass gun regulation­s in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., elementary school massacre in 2012 and the influence the National Rifle Assn. has on Congress.

“I’m [angry] that we’re actually asking ourselves the horrific question of, ’what will it take?’” O’Malley wrote. “Howmany senseless acts of violence in our streets or tragedies in our communitie­s will it take to get our nation to stop caving to special interests like the NRA when people are dying?”

It’s not unexpected that candidates, in the wake of such an event, would stay in what might be considered the political safe zone. The massacre touches on some of the most emotionall­y potent issues in American politics — race, religion and guns. That the shooting took place in an early-voting state, where a misstep or tone-deaf comment might take on a life of its own, only raised the stakes.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independen­t who is seeking the Democratic nomination, saw the potential Thursday for such a misstep. He was hit with criticism on Twitter for holding a noisy rally on Capitol Hill within earshot of where some had gathered to remember the victims of the Charleston shooting.

Sanders later canceled a Sunday campaign event in South Carolina and sent an email to supporters asking them to donate to the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, where the shooting took place.

Sanders, who has deviated from many Democrats on guns by voting against some gun-control legislatio­n, made no reference to the gun issue in his comments.

“The Charleston church killings area tragic reminder of the ugly stain of racism that still taints our nation,” the senator said in a statement. “The hateful killing of nine people praying inside a church is a horrific reminder that, while we have made significan­t progress in advancing civil rights in this country, we are far from eradicatin­g racism.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States