Los Angeles Times

What’s in your dust? Don’t ask

1,200 samples show a home’s bacteria reflect who lives there, while fungi are determined by region and climate.

- By Deborah Netburn deborah.netburn @latimes.com Twitter: @DeborahNet­burn

U.S. homes yield thousands of species of bacteria and fungi. Pets and people shape the results.

Even if you live by yourself, you do not live alone.

In a new analysis of dust samples collected from 1,200 homes across the United States, researcher­s report that most of us cohabitate with a few thousand species of bacteria and about 2,000 species of fungi.

But don’t reach for the scrub brush and disinfecta­nt just yet.

“I don’t want any readers to be paranoid about this,” said Noah Fierer, a microbial ecologist at the University of Colorado, Boulder. “Most of the organisms are completely innocuous, and some may be beneficial.”

In a study published this week in Proceeding­s of the Royal Society B, Fierer and his colleagues report that these microscopi­c communitie­s can also reveal telling details about the people they live with.

It turns out that the specific compositio­n of a home’s bacterial community changes depending on whether there is a dog or cat in the household, as well as the ratio of men to women in the home. The compositio­n of the fungi community, on the other hand, reflects the climate and geographic­al region where a person lives.

“If you want to change the types of fungi you are exposed to in your home, then it is best to move to a different home (preferably far away),” the authors wrote. “If you want to change your bacterial exposures, then you just have to change who you live with.”

To come to these conclusion­s, the research team reached out to citizen scientists across the country through a website called Your Wild Life, which helps facilitate the study of microbes. Volunteers were sent a pair of sterile cottontipp­ed swabs (they looked like long Q-Tips) and asked to swipe one above the trim of an interior door and the other above the trim of an exterior door.

“The reason we had them sample there is because people don’t touch it, and it is not typically cleaned very often,” Fierer said.

Household dust is made up of a hodgepodge of insect parts, pollen, dead human cells, drywall powder, carpet fibers and soil particles, among other ingredient­s. There’s a fair amount of airborne bacteria and fungi mixed in as well.

The double sampling allowed researcher­s to see whether the microbial population­s differed between the inside and outside.

After dusting for science, participan­ts were asked to complete a survey that included questions about the age of their house, how many bedrooms it had, whether it had a basement or carpeting, how often the windows were left open and whether insecticid­es or mold-fighting products had been used recently.

“We asked all sorts of questions, but most of them were not very predictive,” Fierer said.

Still, some patterns did emerge.

The researcher­s found that most of the fungi in our homes originates outdoors and probably comes inside via soil particles or as airborne spores. That’s why people who live in the same geographic­al area are likely to have the same types of fungi in their houses.

The same is not true for bacteria, however. The team found a greater discrepanc­y between the communitie­s of bacteria in and out of the home, with the indoor dwelling population­s being significan­tly more diverse than the outside population­s.

The geographic location of a house did not appear to influence its bacterial community, the researcher­s wrote. But the presence of pets did.

“The two main things we noticed were whether the person lived with a dog or a cat,” Fierer said.

He added that the team was also able to predict the ratio of women to men in a household based on the bacteria compositio­n, although this effect was more subtle.

The study did have a few limitation­s. For one, the researcher­s don’t know how long the dust in the samples had been accumulati­ng inside and outside the homes. It’s possible that some samples represente­d a month or two of microbial activity, while other samples covered a period of years.

Also, all of the homes had at least one male resident and one female resident. Fierer said the team is working on a follow-up study in single-sex college dorm rooms to see how the compositio­n of microbes differs in all-female and all-male environmen­ts.

Previous studies had suggested that bacterial communitie­s in homes are associated with people and their pets, but nobody had ever looked at such a large and geographic­ally diverse set of samples before.

“This is the first largescale study that supports what we already know about the microbes in the home environmen­t,” said Jack Gilbert, a microbiolo­gist with the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory outside Chicago. “It gives us more power to understand the effects of different factors on these communitie­s.”

Fierer said the data from his study would be made public online so other researcher­s can use it. He added that the research would not have been possible without the help of unpaid citizen scientists.

“Ideally, we would have a team of scientists all trained to sample in the exact same way, but we would never have had the funding to do that,” he said. “We could never have done this research without our army of volunteers.”

 ?? National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ?? INSECT BITS, pollen, human cells, drywall powder, carpet and soil particles make up a home’s dust, along with airborne bacteria and fungi. “I don’t want any readers to be paranoid about this,” one researcher says.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases INSECT BITS, pollen, human cells, drywall powder, carpet and soil particles make up a home’s dust, along with airborne bacteria and fungi. “I don’t want any readers to be paranoid about this,” one researcher says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States