Los Angeles Times

A ‘RIVER’ FULL OF RUINS

Matthew Barney’s operatic film ‘River of Fundament,’ disturbing and perplexing, has deluged MOCA.

- CHRISTOPHE­R KNIGHT ART CRITIC christophe­r.knight@latimes.com

Sculptor and filmmaker Matthew Barney has a way with ruins.

The exhausting wreckage and smashed residue of modern life, especially as it unfolded in 20th century industrial America, is one key to “River of Fundament,” the gaudy three-act movie and massive installati­on of related sculptures now at the Geffen Contempora­ry, the Museum of Contempora­ry Art’s warehouse space in Little Tokyo.

Reincarnat­ion is central too. Artists perform the magic when their work engages past spirits. The philosophi­cal notion that following death a person’s soul can live on in a new body is alive in art.

Crushed auto parts swallowed in sludge, funeral barges, drawings of decayed factories and decomposed humanity, monuments to rebirth, open sewers flowing with feces — these and more are on display. Eight of 85 works are monumental. The arduous, visually overstuffe­d film clocks in at a running time of 5 hours, 18 minutes — the length of “Sleep,” Andy Warhol’s nearly blank first movie.

Barney began work on this epic project in 2007. The country was then just sliding toward cruel economic chaos, while the fierce military surge in Iraq was failing to end the raging sectarian bloodletti­ng among Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds unleashed by the American invasion. Standing atop the day’s rubble, his project looks back across ashes and shambles.

If “River of Fundament” — both sculptural and cinematic — finally feels sluggish and inert, it is not for want of trying. The New Yorkbased artist is nothing if not ambitious. His dedication to taking on big themes using a visually inventive gusto is to be admired. (The ensemble took seven years to complete.) This time, though, the project got away from him.

Perhaps the slipperine­ss of the specific source material is the cause.

“River of Fundament” was inspired by “Ancient Evenings,” Norman Mailer’s sprawlingl­y bad 1983 novel — 709 pages of benumbed egocentris­m set in pharaonic Egypt. Over a long, dark night, Ramesses IX reminisces about his ancestor, Ramesses II, obsessed with a huge battle that may or may not have been won.

Mailer’s marvelous 1979 novel “The Executione­r’s Song” had inspired Barney’s 1999 film “Cremaster 2,” in which the writer had a cameo playing escape artist Harry Houdini. Now Mailer’s son John appears as the first of three Mailer reincarnat­ions that anchor Barney’s new film.

Reviews of Mailer’s meditation on the Egyptian book of the dead were mortifying. Literary critic Harold Bloom proposed that the famously combative author was mythologiz­ing himself.

His career had ricocheted between the splendid heights (“The Naked and the Dead,” “The Executione­r’s Song”) and the pitiful depths (“Barbary Shore,” “Portrait of Picasso as a Young Man”). Mailer, looking back from atop his own rubble-strewn empire to civilizati­on’s mysterious origins, strains to make sense of a magic-infused, dust-laden past and his own place in history.

So does Barney’s project. It’s not pretty.

End and beginning

The first sound we hear in the operatic movie is the crisp crack of gunfire. A collaborat­ion with composer Jonathan Bepler, it opens with pristine but moody rustic scenes of the spectacula­r mountain West. A lone hunter in the distance walking along a ridge has raised his rifle and pulled the trigger.

A predator? Dinner? Purposeles­s play? Sustenance entwines with violence, life with death, in an artistic landscape of mythic American dimensions.

Shift to a repulsive New York City sewer, where a bearded, slime-covered man (Barney) slowly rises from brackish water. A modern Osiris, sullen god of the afterlife, climbs up from the dank metropolit­an undergroun­d.

He finds himself inside a dim, book-stuffed Brooklyn apartment. Slipping into a bathroom, Osiris reaches down into the toilet bowl and retrieves a sizable turd. He carefully wraps it in gold leaf, then gently returns the amulet to the depths of the porcelain throne.

No one in the movie theater laughed — at least, not out loud.

Just outside the door, a wake for the recently deceased Mailer is getting underway, setting the stage for the first reincarnat­ion. This ancient evening includes an aging roster of uber-New York characters: Elaine Stritch, Liz Smith, Salman Rushdie, Fran Lebowitz, Lawrence Weiner, Dick Cavett, the last a survivor of a notorious 1971 contretemp­s on his late-night TV chat show with the humorless author.

Trying to follow a cinematic story line isn’t productive, though. Vague impression­s matter more. This is an esoteric movie with mostly gnomic aspiration­s.

Along with 400 other extras, I happened to watch the 2008 filming of a later Act 1 sequence, shot at a defunct used-car lot in Santa Fe Springs, southeast of L.A. It was a long day. Three onlookers suffered slight injury, apparently from flying shards of glass.

Through a violent, extravagan­tly ritualized blaze of high-industrial mayhem, a 1967 Chrysler Crown Imperial was reincarnat­ed as a 1979 Pontiac Firebird. Had Lila Downs, the great Oaxacan ranchera singer, not been present to sanctify the galumphing transforma­tion with a haunting aria, the sweltering day would have been a loss. Bepler’s score is the production’s best feature, though intermitte­ntly.

Barney’s reincarnat­ion saga overlays Mailer, an industrial­strength writer, with automobile­s, an industrial-strength product of American know-how, all beneath an obscuring shroud of ancient Egyptian ceremony. The artist and his times also sneak into the mix.

Barney’s birth year is 1967, like the Crown Imperial. Chrysler is the iconic Manhattan skyscraper that starred in his “Cremaster” films. The shah of Iran was overthrown in 1979, a mix of blessing and curse that marks a turning point in the cataclysmi­c history of Western imperialis­m in the Middle East.

These references find themselves encased in bronze in one of the show’s monumental sculptures. (The largest weighs more than 20 tons.) Nestled in a Chrysler undercarri­age are the four Egyptian jars in which pharaonic undertaker­s would mummify the dead’s viscera. A technical feat of bronze casting, the sludge-laden automobile is a “Canopic Chest.”

As grandiose movie memorabili­a, though, the bronze sculpture’s conceptual resonance is on the order of a colossal baby’s shoe. Barney’s work tends to overwhelm through sheer size, extreme production values and layered symbols.

Big statements

Take the mammoth “Boat of Ra.” A golden metallic straitjack­et, which nods to Houdini, is strewn atop a casting of Mailer’s writing desk, where he toiled for a decade on his Nile misadventu­re. They’re slipped into the upside-down rafters of a full-size attic. Bronze ropes sprawl out on the floor.

The ensemble evokes a royal funerary barge powered by slave labor. Like “Canopic Chest,” there’s formal vigor but not much more.

By stark contrast, the show’s most enchanting work is visually the slightest.

An irregular, almost unnoticed line of scraped markings runs chest-high along the walls of every gallery, encircling the cumbersome ensemble within an ephemeral record of yearning labor. The sitespecif­ic rendering was made by eight female athletes who dragged a 5,000-pound block of carbon around the museum, pressing the mass up against walls as they went.

Called “Drawing Restraint #23,” it’s one of a series that began with a performanc­e at the artist’s 1991 debut exhibition at West Hollywood’s Stuart Regen Gallery. The drawings operate on the basic weightlift­ing principle that resistance increases strength.

What works at Gold’s Gym is born out on the Geffen’s walls. Presumably Mailer’s leaden book would provide the same necessary resistance to create a muscular movie, yet that didn’t pan out.

Organized by Munich’s Haus der Kunst, where it opened in the spring, and overseen at MOCA by assistant curator Lanka Tattersall, the show also takes a serious tumble. Half of a brand-new suite of 14 Barney sculptures, a number vaguely related to Osiris’ usurper brother, has been added for L.A.’s version of the show.

Called “Water Castings,” they were made by pouring molten bronze into a watery pit of clay silt. The bronze solidifies into lacy, abstract forms, like fan coral crossed with Queen Anne’s lace.

The suite’s other half is on view at Regen Projects. The gallery, along with the artist’s galleries in New York and London, is among the museum show’s underwrite­rs.

MOCA, by sharing the gallery display, creates a jarring commercial ethos for itself — pay-to-play, plus potential for payback. Had all of Barney’s new work been at the gallery while “Fundament” was at the museum, there would have been no perception problem.

The Wagnerian ambition of “Fundament” recalls German artists such as Joseph Beuys and Anselm Kiefer, while the subjects, methods and motifs reflect Americans Paul McCarthy, Charles Ray, Lynda Benglis, Kiki Smith and Mike Kelley. The grand chronicle even evokes Thomas Cole, whose 19th century apocalypti­c paintings “The Voyage of Life” and “The Course of Empire” took wild Christian journeys through abundance, ruin, wilderness and rebirth.

Yet scatology doesn’t begin to describe what flows through Barney’s distended art, where Western civilizati­on’s foundation is also humanity’s anus. (On to the excrementa­l orgy!)

Like most operas, the movie is divided into three acts, which MOCA screens in its entirety on Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays in a comfortabl­e small theater inside the Geffen. The experience is unique if also unfulfilli­ng.

 ??  ??
 ?? Hugo Glendinnin­g Gladstone Gallery ?? MATTHEW BARNEY’S 2014 film “River of Fundament” explores death and rebirth, among many other topics, in its 5-hour, 18-minute running time.
Hugo Glendinnin­g Gladstone Gallery MATTHEW BARNEY’S 2014 film “River of Fundament” explores death and rebirth, among many other topics, in its 5-hour, 18-minute running time.
 ?? Fredrik Nilsen ?? “BOAT OF RA,” a sculpture related to the film, nods to Norman Mailer, the project’s inspiratio­n.
Fredrik Nilsen “BOAT OF RA,” a sculpture related to the film, nods to Norman Mailer, the project’s inspiratio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States