Los Angeles Times

A retirement question

- By Karen Kaplan karen.kaplan@latimes.com Twitter: @LATkarenka­plan

Is retirement hazardous to your health?

It’s an intriguing question in light of a new study that finds senior citizens who work are in better health than their counterpar­ts who don’t.

Researcher­s from the University of Miami and their colleagues examined data on more than 83,000 Americans who participat­ed in the National Health Interview Survey between 1997 and 2011. All of them were at least 65 years old when they were interviewe­d, and 13% of them were still working part time or full time. The majority of these workers — 61% — held white-collar positions.

Compared with people with white-collar jobs, those who were unemployed or retired were 2.75 times more likely to report their health as “poor” or “fair.” (The other options were “good,” “very good” or “excellent.”) People with blue-collar jobs, service-industry jobs or who worked on farms rated their health as about the same as their white-collar peers.

The survey also rated health using a measure called the Health and Activities Limitation Index, or HALex, which includes factors like whether people need help taking care of themselves or have limitation­s in the kind of work they can do. The 80% of people with the highest HALex scores were considered to be in good shape, compared with the 20% of people who had the lowest scores.

The researcher­s found that unemployed and retired senior citizens were nearly six times more likely than the white-collar workers to have a low HALex score. Again, other types of workers scored about the same as white-collar workers.

Older Americans with jobs also fared better on more objective measures of health. For instance, the National Health Interview Survey included informatio­n on whether people had ever been diagnosed with serious conditions like cancer, diabetes and heart disease. Compared to those with white-collar jobs, those who were unemployed or retired were 49% more likely to have a history of at least two of these health problems.

By this measure, bluecollar workers were in even better health than white-collar workers: They were 16% less likely to have two or more of these health problems.

Finally, interviewe­rs asked whether people needed any assistance or special equipment to do things like stand, walk or climb stairs. Unemployed and retired seniors were 88% more likely than white-collar workers to have multiple functional limitation­s, researcher­s found. In addition, the odds of having two or more limitation­s were 16% lower for blue-collar workers and 18% lower for service workers.

“Being unemployed/retired was associated with the greatest risk of poor health across all health status measures, even after controllin­g for smoking status, obesity, and other predictors of health,” the study authors concluded.

The results don’t show that working past retirement age is what made senior citizens with jobs healthier than their non-working peers. Indeed, the authors acknowledg­ed that the reverse is often true: Health problems force some people to drop out of the workforce.

Still, understand­ing the health benefits associated with working past age 65 could motivate businesses to find ways to accommodat­e older workers, even if they have some limitation­s, researcher­s wrote.

The report was published Thursday in the journal Preventing Chronic Disease, a publicatio­n of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 ?? Carlos Chavez
Los Angeles Times ?? A SENIOR learns computer skills in Ventura. A study has found that older people who continue working are in better health than their counterpar­ts who retire.
Carlos Chavez Los Angeles Times A SENIOR learns computer skills in Ventura. A study has found that older people who continue working are in better health than their counterpar­ts who retire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States