Los Angeles Times

Bronze Age Britons mummified dead

Evidence indicates that preservati­on of bodies was more widespread than was previously thought.

- By Deborah Netburn deborah.netburn @latimes.com

Archaeolog­ists have found evidence of mummies in England.

Specifical­ly, they found mummified remains in seven Bronze Age burial sites throughout the British Isles.

The findings, published in the journal Antiquity, suggests that the art of mummificat­ion was more widespread in ancient Britain than was previously thought.

Just to be clear, the mummies of Britain are not the same as the Egyptian mummies you might be imagining.

The researcher­s define mummificat­ion as “the preservati­on of bodily soft tissue via natural processes ... or artificial means.”

A natural mummificat­ion process might be putting a corpse in a preservati­ve environmen­t such as a peat bog. An artificial way to achieve the same effect is embalming or smoking.

“There are many ways to mummify a body,” said Thomas Booth, a postdoctor­al researcher at the Museum of Natural History in London and the first author on the paper.

Also, keep in mind that the British climate is not nearly as conducive to the preservati­on of soft tissue as the hot dry Egyptian desert. Therefore, the mummies of England and Scotland look more like skeletons than their Egyptian counterpar­ts. This makes it difficult to determine by sight alone which bones may have belonged to bodies that had been deliberate­ly preserved.

To understand where and when mummificat­ion might have taken place in ancient Europe, Booth and his collaborat­ors put samples of 307 bones from 26 archaeolog­ical sites under a microscope.

After examining the bones of mummies from Yemen and Ireland, they were able to show that centuries-old mummified bones look different from those not from mummified bodies.

The reason? There is evidence that when a person dies, the gut bacteria escape from the body and start breaking down soft tissue, including the interior microstruc­ture of the bones, Booth said. This process is known as putrefacti­on.

However, if a body is preserved right after death, the putrefacti­on process does not have time to get started and the microstruc­ture of the bones stays intact.

“With most archaeolog­ical bones we see extensive microscopi­c tunneling,” he said. “But mummified bones show little to no tunneling.”

The vast majority of bones the team looked at did have lots of tunneling, but more than half of the bones from skeletons dug up on the British Isles and dated to the Bronze Age (from 2000 B.C. to750 B.C.) had just a little bit of tunneling, suggesting they had been mummified.

The researcher­s say that mummificat­ion in the Bronze Age was not uniform. Some of the bones looked a bit burned, suggesting that the body had been smoked over a fire to preserve it. Other corpses may have been put in peat bogs and removed later. For others the organs may have been cut out soon after death to keep putrefacti­on at bay.

“It looks like people were taking advantage of their natural resources to produce these preserved bodies,” Booth said.

In addition, mummified bones were found yards away from non-mummified bones in the same archaeolog­ical sites, suggesting that just an elite few got the mummy treatment.

Booth completed this work while getting his doctorate at Sheffield University in England. For now, he is not entirely sure what the motivation was for preserving the dead in Britain’s Bronze Age culture, but he said it seemed clear that it was different from what the Egyptians were doing.

“In Egypt, after a body was mummified, it was locked away in tombs, and never seen again,” he said. “In the Bronze Age in Britain, mummies were kept above ground and still had an active role in living society.”

‘In Egypt, after a body was mummified, it was locked away in tombs.... In the Bronze Age in Britain, mummies were kept above ground and still had an active role in living society.’

— Thomas Booth,

the first author on the paper

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States