Los Angeles Times

Supreme showdown in the works

Obama may make a bolder choice if the Senate GOP insists on blocking him from filling high court seat.

- By David G. Savage and David Lauter

WASHINGTON — As President Obama moves to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the vow by Senate Republican­s to block any nominee is providing him with a powerful incentive to focus on more liberal candidates.

Often, particular­ly when facing a Senate controlled by the other party, a president will seek a nominee who has bipartisan appeal. But if Republican­s hold to their position of refusing to confirm anyone before the election, that sort of cross- party appeal has less utility.

With abortion, climate change, gun control, religious liberty and union rights all among the issues that have crowded onto the court’s docket of late, the stakes are high. Both sides have begun setting the grounds for an all- out political battle.

Democrats see a chance to have a liberal majority on the high court for the f irst time in more than four decades. Republican­s fear the

loss of a court that, despite some left- leaning rulings on issues such as same- sex marriage, has mostly stood as a conservati­ve bulwark.

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas spoke for many on the conservati­ve side during the Republican candidates’ debate Saturday night, a few hours after Scalia’s death became publicly known, when he made this declaratio­n:

“We’re not going to give up the U. S. Supreme Court for a generation” by approving an Obama nominee.

Republican­s want Obama to leave the decision to the next president, arguing there is an 80- year precedent of not confirming high court justices during a presidenti­al election year. Court experts, however, point to half a dozen examples since 1900, including under both Republican and Democratic presidents.

White House officials refused most public comment on the confirmati­on battle.

“As the president said last night, he takes his constituti­onal responsibi­lity seriously and will approach this nomination with the time and rigor required,” said Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz. “Given that the Senate is currently in recess, we don’t expect the president to rush this through this week, but instead will do so in due time once the Senate returns from their re- cess.”

In his two previous Supreme Court selections, Obama took about a month to decide.

Behind the scenes, administra­tion officials were starting to review a list of names that the White House counsel’s office and Justice Department keep at the ready. A key decision for Obama will be how liberal a candidate to select.

The vast majority of his judicial picks have been relatively moderate lawyers, somewhat to the disappoint­ment of some liberal activists. Obama likes to point out that Justice Elena Kagan, his second nominee and a noted liberal, was championed by both conservati­ves and liberals on the Harvard Law School faculty when she was the dean there. Scalia himself had suggested Kagan’s name, Obama’s former top aide, David Axelrod, said Sunday on CNN.

Democrats predicted that whoever Obama picks will f it that mold and that Republican­s will have difficulty blocking his candidate.

“I believe that many of the mainstream Republican­s, when the president nominates a mainstream nominee, will not want to follow Mitch McConnell over the cliff,” said Sen. Charles E. Schumer of New York, the third- ranking Democrat in the Senate, referring to the chamber’s Republican leader.

“The American people don’t like this obstructio­n. When you go right off the bat and say, ‘ I don’t care who he nominates, I am going to oppose him,’ that’s not going to f ly,” Schumer said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Liberal activists, however, said Obama can and should select a nominee who can help energize the Democratic electorate to win the White House and possibly retake control of the Senate.

“He needs someone who can create a groundswel­l on the left and who will make the Republican­s squirm,” said one Democrat close to the process who spoke on condition of anonymity to comment on the closeddoor White House deliberati­ons.

If Scalia had died last year, the heavy favorite would have been Judge Sri Srinivasan, a 48- year- old Obama appointee to the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington. He was born in India but grew up in Lawrence, Kan., where he was a basketball star and a stellar student.

In Washington legal circles, he is seen as an extremely smart, even- tempered lawyer, relatively conservati­ve for his party, who has worked well with Republican­s and Democrats. He won a unanimous confirmati­on in the Senate three years ago, where he was praised by Cruz, among others. The two were law clerks at the Supreme Court the same year. He would also be the f irst Asian American to serve on the high court.

But one of Srinivasan’s chief assets — his bipartisan appeal — may be less important now. And his reputation for conservati­sm may make him less attractive than other candidates.

Some close watchers of the court and the confirmati­on process predict that the nation’s first black president will want to nominate an African American to the court. If Republican­s were seen as blocking a black nominee, that could help generate higher African American turnout in the election.

“I think the president personally will be very tempted to appoint a black justice,” said Washington attorney Tom Goldstein, founder of the Scotusblog, a website covering the Supreme Court. “The president likely sees value in providing a counterpoi­nt to the court’s only black justice, the very conservati­ve Clarence Thomas.”

Goldstein and others pointed to Judge Paul J. Watford, an Obama appointee to the U. S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, as a likely choice.

Watford was born in 1967 and grew up in Orange County. He has degrees from UC Berkeley and UCLA School of Law, and was a clerk for Judge Alex Kozinski on the 9th Circuit in Pasadena, as well as for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. He prosecuted frauds as an assistant U. S. attorney in Los Angeles and worked as an appellate lawyer at Munger, Tolles & Olson in L. A.

The president could also look at several other wellqualif­ied black candidates, such as Judge Robert Wilkins, whom Obama appointed to the same D. C. circuit court where Srinivasan sits. Obama could turn to his Cabinet to select Jeh Johnson, 58, the secretary of Homeland Security, who served as general counsel at the Pentagon, or to Atty. Gen. Loretta Lynch, 56.

Another candidate often mentioned is former Massachuse­tts Gov. Deval Patrick, 59, a friend of Obama’s who led the Justice Department’s civil rights division in the Clinton administra­tion.

 ?? Chad Rachman
Associated Press ?? TALK about replacing Antonin Scalia began shortly after his death.
Chad Rachman Associated Press TALK about replacing Antonin Scalia began shortly after his death.
 ?? Brendan Smialowski
AFP/ Getty I mages ?? FLOWERS OUTSIDE the U. S. Supreme Court pay tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia, who was found dead Saturday. Republican­s fear that without his voice, the court’s conservati­ve wing will lose its inf luence.
Brendan Smialowski AFP/ Getty I mages FLOWERS OUTSIDE the U. S. Supreme Court pay tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia, who was found dead Saturday. Republican­s fear that without his voice, the court’s conservati­ve wing will lose its inf luence.
 ??  ?? FEDERAL APPEALS court Judges Sri Srinivasan, left, and Paul J. Watford are possibilit­ies.
FEDERAL APPEALS court Judges Sri Srinivasan, left, and Paul J. Watford are possibilit­ies.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States