Los Angeles Times

Democrats reach a deal on superdeleg­ates

- By Chris Megerian chris.megerian@latimes.com

PHILADELPH­IA — Democrats reached an agreement on Saturday that could sharply reduce the influence of superdeleg­ates in the next presidenti­al election, resolving an emotionall­y charged issue that threatened to boil over this week.

The deal represents another way Bernie Sanders has left his mark on the Democratic Party despite being defeated by Hillary Clinton in the primary. The party’s policy platform has already been modified to reflect some of the Vermont senator’s goals, including a $15-per-hour federal minimum wage and free tuition for many college students.

Superdeleg­ates, who are elected officials and party leaders who can throw their support to a presidenti­al candidate independen­t of state primary results, have been a fault line this year. They overwhelmi­ngly backed Clinton, often pledging their support before the first primary vote was cast.

Although superdeleg­ates didn’t deliver Clinton her victory — she also won the popular vote and a greater number of pledged delegates — Sanders has argued that they play an undemocrat­ic role in the nominating process.

The final deal approved by the rules committee will create a commission that will draft changes to the superdeleg­ate system. Only elected officials would be allowed to be superdeleg­ates, reducing their numbers by two-thirds.

Although the commission’s final report — due in 2018, two years before the next presidenti­al election — would still need to be approved by the full Democratic National Committee, the Sanders campaign is confident in the process.

“This would be a big step,” said Ben Jealous, a Sanders supporter and a former president of the National Assn. for the Advancemen­t of Colored People.

The amendment creating the commission was overwhelmi­ngly approved while committee members cheered, a show of unity that came on the heels of a divisive debate over the issue. Several expressed renewed commitment to defeating Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.

“We have to hang together, or we might hang separately,” said Arthur Cheliotes, a Sanders delegate from New York.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), who had resisted changes to the superdeleg­ate system earlier in the day, also supported the amendment.

“We shall overcome and elect the next president of the United States, Hillary Rodham Clinton,” she said.

The agreement reduces the chance that the issue will spill over onto the convention floor this week, which could create a messy spectacle for Clinton at a time when she’s hoping for a unified front as she accepts the Democratic nomination.

The superdeleg­ate system was created as an attempt to balance the voices of voters and political insiders after the landslide defeats of Democratic nominees George McGovern in 1972 and President Jimmy Carter in 1980.

It was reviewed after the 2008 election, when a Democratic commission said their influence should be sharply reduced. But party leaders ultimately did not follow that recommenda­tion.

African American members of Congress have often argued to leave the system in place because it helps give minorities a greater voice in the nomination process.

Party leaders also haven’t wanted to lose their inf luence or allow a situation where elected officials would have to run against their own constituen­ts for a delegate slot.

“We have been the cornerston­e of building an inclusive party,” said Donna Brazile, a superdeleg­ate and Democratic strategist.

But others fear superdeleg­ates could be used to unfairly tilt the scales of Democratic primaries in the future.

 ?? Mark Wilson Getty Images ?? BERNIE SANDERS has argued against the use of superdeleg­ates.
Mark Wilson Getty Images BERNIE SANDERS has argued against the use of superdeleg­ates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States