Los Angeles Times

Ballot rules are all over the map

A proposed bill would require the creation of new guidelines on provisiona­l voting for all California counties.

- JOHN MYERS john.myers@latimes.com

SACRAMENTO — Once reserved for emergency situations, provisiona­l ballots were freely handed out across California on June 7. A Times analysis found they were used by more than 1 in 5 primary voters who showed up at a polling place.

But the wide use of provisiona­l ballots has not been matched by any broad statewide oversight, with rules changing from one county to the next, dictating when they are used and how elections officials decide whether to count them as valid votes.

“You think it would be clean and simple,” said Donna Tarr, a resident of Rolling Hills Estates who volunteere­d to observe provisiona­l ballot counting in Los Angeles County last month.

A provisiona­l ballot has historical­ly been seen as an election fail-safe, reserved for the small number of people whose eligibilit­y to vote can’t be immediatel­y confirmed by a poll worker.

The ballots are then placed in specially marked envelopes and set aside to be examined after all other votes are counted.

Tarr, 64, was one of several supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders who descended on county elections offices after the June election to observe how provisiona­l ballots were processed and how many were actually counted.

When she and others complained that some provisiona­l ballots cast by unaffiliat­ed “no party preference” voters were not being correctly counted in the Democratic presidenti­al race, Los Angeles County elections officials quickly stepped in to fix the problem.

Tarr wanted to know whether it was an issue that stretched to other communitie­s. In late June, she sent an email to state elections officials demanding that they intervene to ensure similar problems weren’t happening in all of California’s 58 counties.

“We said, ‘Holy cow! You can’t go on like this,’ ” Tarr said.

State election law is largely limited to the legal right of a voter to ask for a provisiona­l ballot, while leaving a significan­t amount of discretion to local officials in regard to how often the ballots are used.

“We’re all left to interpret these things county by county,” said Joe Canciamill­a, Contra Costa County’s registrar of voters.

Partial data compiled by the state associatio­n of elections officers and supplement­ed by requests from The Times made to two dozen counties found that more than 735,000 provisiona­l ballots were cast at polling places on election day in California.

About 55% of those ballots were from three counties combined — Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange.

“It’s clear that there’s been an explosion of voting provisiona­lly,” Assemblyma­n Evan Low (D-Campbell) said.

Low is the author of a bill pending in the Legislatur­e that would require the secretary of state to create new guidelines for all counties to follow in handling provisiona­l and vote-bymail ballots.

Individual voters who cast a provisiona­l ballot currently can check whether it was counted and receive an explanatio­n if it was rejected. But most counties don’t publicly post informatio­n about the total number of provisiona­l ballots that were received or counted.

Five counties — Fresno, Imperial, Modoc, Mono and Nevada — did not respond to several Times requests for data on provisiona­l ballots.

“California­ns expect consistenc­y and transparen­cy in the process,” Low said.

The data make clear that even with varying rules and procedures, few provisiona­l ballots are disqualifi­ed.

“There’s a lot of misinforma­tion out there,” said Rebecca Spencer, registrar of voters in Riverside County.

Spencer and her team certified more than 85% of the county’s 31,435 provisiona­l ballots — close to the statewide average for the June election, according to a Times analysis of election data.

But few believe the existing systems are adequate to handle a steady rise in provisiona­l voting, which some elections officials expect as California­ns increasing­ly request ballots in the mail.

If those voters decide at the last minute to show up at a precinct but don’t bring along the original mailed ballot and its official envelope, they usually end up casting a provisiona­l ballot.

“The more paper you have floating around, the more opportunit­ies you have for confusion,” said Canciamill­a, the Contra Costa County registrar of voters.

Low’s bill for new statewide standards is supported by Secretary of State Alex Padilla, who said in a statement that it “will improve voter confidence in the elections process.”

Low said that as voting behaviors change in California, the system must change, too.

“The standards are woefully out of place,” he said. “This is about the integrity of the electoral process.”

 ?? Francine Orr Los Angeles Times ?? A SIGNIFICAN­T AMOUNT of discretion is left to local officials in regard to how often provisiona­l ballots are used.
Francine Orr Los Angeles Times A SIGNIFICAN­T AMOUNT of discretion is left to local officials in regard to how often provisiona­l ballots are used.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States