Los Angeles Times

A request for documents is blocked

- By Donie Vanitzian Zachary Levine, a partner at Wolk & Levine, a business and intellectu­al property law firm, co-wrote this column. Vanitzian is an arbitrator and mediator. Send questions to Donie Vanitzian, JD, P.O. Box 10490, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 or

Question: I recently asked our board for copies of board meeting minutes for the last 12 months. I asked in person and also made a request via email to the management company.

In response, management sent me a “Documents Request Form” to complete. It requires the date, address, unit number, name, name of LLC or trust and driver’s license or California ID number of the requester, with copies attached. It also requires a descriptio­n of the documents requested and a stated reason and purpose for requesting the documents. Finally, titleholde­rs must sign a declaratio­n that the documents received by the homeowner “will not be copied or distribute­d for improper use, nor sold to third parties for personal benefit.”

None of our governing documents require that we provide a copy of our driver’s license. In November 2015, the board wrote and adopted a new set of rules and regulation­s requiring the use of this form. Is this legal? Answer: First, know that Civil Code section 5205 gives owners the right to inspect associatio­n records upon request.

If an associatio­n does not have a business office within the developmen­t, the associatio­n can make the specified records available for inspection and copying at a place agreed to by the associatio­n member.

As for getting copies of documents, titleholde­rs must make a written request, but there are only so many hoops that a board can require a homeowner to jump through for records.

If the form was created by the management company without an accompanyi­ng board vote, then the form is invalid. Failure to use a management company’s form cannot be a basis to deny a legal request from a homeowner for associatio­n records.

Homeowners would only be required to use such a form if the board took a legal vote on the matter. That would require the board to give notice of a meeting, hold a vote and record the results and the new rule in the minutes.

The board also needs to authorize a person to receive such documents on behalf of the associatio­n. That person should be named in the associatio­n’s annual policy statement. If no person has been designated to receive documents, the document should be delivered to the president or secretary of the associatio­n.

Still, merely adopting a rule does not automatica­lly validate the form itself.

The form includes the troublesom­e phrase that it “will not be copied or distribute­d for improper use, nor sold to third parties for personal benefit.” It fails to define the terms “improper use” and “third parties” let alone provide a legal definition of “personal benefit,” thus making the declaratio­n invalid. No law requires the owner to sign a declaratio­n in order to view or obtain associatio­n documents.

It also appears that much of the informatio­n requested on the form is superfluou­s to the owner’s request to obtain documents. Because any titleholde­r has a right to inspect the associatio­n’s records, the associatio­n need only confirm the identity of an owner making a request. Demanding more of a homeowner can be seen as an unreasonab­le barrier to exercising a fundamenta­l right of associatio­n membership — namely access to informatio­n regarding associatio­n governance.

While certain documents may be withheld or redacted according to Civil Code section 5215, there is nothing in the law that requires the production of a copy of your driver’s license or an attestatio­n requiring a stated declaratio­n for use of the documents.

Providing superfluou­s informatio­n also creates a danger of identity theft.

Once an owner volunteers personal informatio­n, it becomes the property of the homeowner associatio­n. Typically, that informatio­n is retained by boards and management companies with no assurances it won’t be sold, shared or accessed by third parties. Thieves covet drivers’ license and bank account numbers.

The risk of identity theft also creates a liability for the board, since associatio­ns are responsibl­e for custody and control of all the data they collect. The board should seriously consider eliminatin­g this form because of this potential risk.

For further guidance to both boards and titleholde­rs, Civil Code section 4035 spells out how certain specific requests must be made, including:

To change the owner’s informatio­n in the associatio­n membership list, opt out of the membership list or to cancel a request to opt out of the membership list.

To add or remove a second address for delivery of individual notices to the owner.

For individual delivery of general notices or to cancel a request for individual delivery of notices.

To receive a full copy of an annual budget report or annual policy statement.

To receive all reports in full, or to cancel a request to receive all reports in full.

As a general rule, all communicat­ions with the associatio­n should be in writing and sent using a recognized method of tracking with signature receipt. Using a tracking method requiring a signature receipt is also a good idea when sending associatio­n payments. Hang on to those tracking and signature receipts; you may need them later.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States