Los Angeles Times

FBI investigat­es whether Russians hacked emails

Democrats say the heist is an attempt to bolster Trump.

- By Del Quentin Wilber, Tracy Wilkinson and Brian Bennett del.wilber@latimes.com tracy.wilkinson@latimes.com brian.bennett@latimes.com Times staff writers Christi Parsons and Michael A. Memoli contribute­d to this report.

WASHINGTON — The plot seems ripped from the pages of a post-Cold War espionage thriller: Russian spy services hack into the Democratic Party’s computers, pilfer reams of data and leak damaging emails in the hopes of helping elect a preferred presidenti­al candidate.

Yet that is exactly the allegation the FBI confirmed Monday it is investigat­ing.

The recent hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computers has left U.S. officials scrambling over how to respond to a cyberattac­k that may have crossed a new line in the secretive world of state-sponsored spying and computer warfare.

One government official equated the hack against one of America’s main political parties to an assault on the nation’s “critical infrastruc­ture,” such as the electrical grid.

The FBI’s terse statement confirming the investigat­ion came just three days after Wikileaks published a trove of nearly 20,000 internal DNC emails that showed its leaders privately favoring former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders, in the party’s primary. The embarrassi­ng emails forced the resignatio­n over the weekend of the party’s chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

But the specter of Russia’s involvemen­t has begun to loom larger and is far more concerning to former FBI officials, diplomats and cybersecur­ity experts who expressed concerns that Russia could be seeking to tip the electoral scales in favor of Clinton’s Republican opponent, Donald Trump.

Clinton’s top campaign officials wasted no time in seeking to deflect attention from the emails’ contents to the possibilit­y that Russia might be trying to help Trump. It marked a surprising turnaround since Republican­s traditiona­lly viewed Russia, and the Soviet Union before that, with a wary eye, and had frequently accused Democrats of being too soft on America’s Cold War enemy.

In the 2012 election, Republican presidenti­al candidate Mitt Romney called Russia “our No. 1 geopolitic­al foe.”

Now Clinton operatives are pointing to statements by the business mogul that indicate a break with GOP orthodoxy, suggesting he would be more lenient in dealing with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has praised Putin’s leadership style and said recently that he might not support some NATO allies if they were attacked by Russia, a remark quickly condemned by Democrats and Republican­s alike.

Clinton campaign officials have also noted that Trump’s campaign co-chairman, Paul Manafort, previously worked as a consultant for the now-ousted pro-Russian government in Ukraine.

At a news conference Monday, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook cited the assessment of unnamed experts that Russian state actors had facilitate­d the hacking and release of the emails “for the purpose of helping Donald Trump.”

The Trump campaign strongly rebutted such allegation­s. On Twitter, the candidate called the claims “a joke.” His son, Donald Trump Jr., told CNN that he could not “think of bigger lies.”

Manafort denied there were any ties between the campaign and Putin. “That’s absurd,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States