Los Angeles Times

Trump vs. Hollywood

He hits Streep in the latest salvo in the culture wars

- By Cathleen Decker

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump’s rebuke of Meryl Streep for criticizin­g his past bullying was less about Streep than two imperative­s for the president-elect: portraying himself in the best possible light and convincing the public that he’s more “us” than “them.”

The back and forth unfolded in a fashion that has become familiar. Streep issued a nuanced denunciati­on of Trump during Sunday’s Golden Globe Awards. It avoided mention of his name but focused on his 2015 speech in which he formed his arms into bent positions and mimicked Serge F. Kovaleski, a New York Times reporter who has a congenital disease, arthrogryp­osis, that distorts his arm and leg joints.

The videotape of that

speech “sank its hooks into my heart,” said Streep, who supported Hillary Clinton last year but is not typically central to the Hollywood political establishm­ent.

“I still can’t get it out of my head, because it wasn’t in a movie. It was real life,” she said in an address that focused on an actor’s need for empathy.

The “instinct to humiliate,” she said, coarsens all of society. “When the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose.”

As regular as an atomic clock, the president-elect early Monday returned fire. He derided Streep, the most decorated American actress of her generation, and denied once again that he had ever mocked Kovaleski, despite the video evidence.

“Meryl Streep, one of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood, doesn’t know me but attacked last night at the Golden Globes,” Trump tweeted.

“She is a Hillary flunky who lost big. For the 100th time, I never ‘mocked’ a disabled reporter (would never do that) but simply showed him ‘groveling’ when he totally changed a 16-year-old story to make me look bad. Just more very dishonest media.”

Trump’s comments displayed his unwillingn­ess to turn aside any personal slight, a potentiall­y troublesom­e attribute 11 days before his inaugurati­on to the world’s most criticized job.

His response was also the latest iteration of culture wars that for decades have cast Hollywood’s glittering and mostly liberal denizens as the enemies of real America.

The tweets also repeated a pattern of Trump making statements that were false on several counts: He had imitated Kovaleski’s arm movements after verbally calling attention to them: “Now, the poor guy, you ought to see this guy,” he had said before contorting his arms and waving them spasmodica­lly.

And Kovaleski has not changed the story Trump referred to, which centered on Trump’s long-debunked statement that he had watched Muslims in New Jersey cheering and dancing in 2001 as the World Trade Center was attacked.

Trump represents an odd combatant in the culture war’s fisticuffs, despite his political alliances. He’s a billionair­e residing in elite and liberal Manhattan known for his own television show, over which he retains the role of executive producer and for which he received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

Two of his key White House selections — Treasury Secretary-designate Steven Mnuchin and chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon — amassed considerab­le personal wealth in Hollywood. Mnuchin financed movies such as “Avatar” and this year’s “Sully,” for which he was executive producer. Bannon struck it rich with a stake in the company that produced “Seinfeld.”

And Trump seems to publicly covet acceptance from the entertainm­ent capital, the latest evidence of which came in a Monday interview with the New York Times.

“We are going to have an unbelievab­le, perhaps record-setting turnout for the inaugurati­on, and there will be plenty of movie and entertainm­ent stars,” Mr. Trump said. “All the dress shops are sold out in Washington. It’s hard to find a great dress for this inaugurati­on.”

Dresses are still available, and so far there do not appear to be as many wellknown entertainm­ent figures clamoring to celebrate Trump as they did his predecesso­r, President Obama. The adoration imbalance seemed to be at least an undercurre­nt of his sniping at Streep.

“This is his crowd; this is who he would want to have at the inaugural,” said Marty Kaplan, director of the Norman Lear Center at USC, who has worked in Democratic politics and entertainm­ent. “If he were offered any three tables from the Golden Globes to come to his inaugurati­on in exchange for those tweets, he would have done it in a heartbeat.”

Monday swirled with predictabl­e, and often partisan, responses, with people on both sides seeming to be “Casablanca”-level shocked that once again public discourse had sunk so low.

Meghan McCain, the Fox News personalit­y whose father, Arizona Sen. John McCain, has battled with Trump over Russia, suggested that Streep’s remarks were evidence of a Hollywood bubble that alienated Trump’s voters.

“This Meryl Streep speech is why Trump won,” she tweeted. “And if people in Hollywood don’t start recognizin­g why and how — you will help him get re-elected.”

That earned her a vulgar reproach from Billy Eichner of the TBS show “Billy on the Street.”

“Um, she asked him not to make fun of disabled people and advocated for the freedom of the press and the arts you [bleeping] moron,” he responded.

Actress Patricia Heaton, currently of ABC’s “The Middle” and late of CBS’ “Everybody Loves Raymond,” found herself blistered for opining that she would rather have heard Streep talk about acting.

Heaton, one of the acting community’s highest-profile conservati­ves, clarified that “of course, Meryl Streep is entitled to her opinion/say what she wants. I just like actors’ stories.” Heaton added, “I didn’t vote for Trump (or Hillary).”

Industry veterans are used to being on the receiving end of criticism from politician­s and some of the Americans who in effect pay their salaries.

The House Un-American Activities Committee had the entertainm­ent industry in its sights in the years after World War II, accusing actors, producers and writers of leftist sympathies and prompting a blacklist that lasted more than a decade and ruined careers. (Roy Cohn, the chief counsel to Sen. Joseph McCarthy in the early 1950s when the Wisconsin Republican led investigat­ions into alleged communist inf luence in the U.S., later served as a mentor to Trump.)

In 2000, just before Al Gore accepted the Democratic nomination in Los Angeles, his campaign had to beat down concerns from Democrats in Hollywood about his newly named running mate, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticu­t, who had criticized risque televi- sion shows and movies.

Lieberman, in an echo of Trump’s effort, said his actions were an attempt to stand “with the people against the powerful.”

Democratic criticisms of the entertainm­ent industry have lessened as the party has moved to the left — and Hollywood has become more powerful as a fundraisin­g and political force. Republican­s have not followed suit, even if they have utilized Hollywood stars at their convention­s and events.

Vice President Dan Quayle took on the fictional character of CBS’ “Murphy Brown” when she was portrayed as an unwed mother. A few years later, 1996 presidenti­al nominee Bob Dole insisted, from a 20th Century Fox soundstage, that “the American people are rejecting entertainm­ent that … offends our sense of decency.” Earlier, he called Hollywood a “nightmare of depravity.”

Their strategy has produced dual rewards: making politician­s appear sympatheti­c to the concerns of everyday Americans, even if their own lifestyles are more akin to Hollywood’s than to the culturally conservati­ve voters the politician­s are seeking to attract.

And then there’s money: Within hours of Trump’s missive against Streep, his party’s senatorial campaign committee sent out fundraisin­g letters citing the exchange.

The unavoidabl­e questions surfaced: Was he only temporaril­y miffed? Was he trying to distract from more politicall­y dangerous controvers­ies? And the perennial Trump question: This time, did he go too far?

“Don’t you think he lost even some of his own supporters by calling Meryl Streep ‘overrated’?” asked one person with deep ties to the industry.

If recent history is a reliable guide, the answer was probably no.

‘If he were offered any three tables from the Golden Globes to come to his inaugurati­on in exchange for those tweets, he would have done it in a heartbeat.’ — Marty Kaplan, director of the Norman Lear Center at USC, who says Donald Trump wants the approval of Hollywood

 ?? Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. ?? “WHEN THE POWERFUL use their position to bully others, we all lose,” Meryl Streep said at the Golden Globe Awards on Sunday, referring to Donald Trump.
Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. “WHEN THE POWERFUL use their position to bully others, we all lose,” Meryl Streep said at the Golden Globe Awards on Sunday, referring to Donald Trump.
 ?? Evan Vucci Associated Press ?? DONALD TRUMP, shown at Trump Tower in New York, is an odd combatant in the culture wars. He lives in liberal Manhattan and has ties to Hollywood.
Evan Vucci Associated Press DONALD TRUMP, shown at Trump Tower in New York, is an odd combatant in the culture wars. He lives in liberal Manhattan and has ties to Hollywood.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States