Los Angeles Times

Backpage.com shuts down its adult section

Website cites a federal ‘censorship’ campaign for its closure after a stinging Senate report.

- By Matt Hamilton

Backpage.com, one of the world’s largest classified ad websites and a frequent target in the political battle against sex traffickin­g, closed its adult ads section Monday in the United States, claiming to be the victim of a government witch hunt.

The extraordin­ary move came shortly after the release of a scathing U.S. Senate report that accused Backpage of hiding criminal activity by deleting terms from ads that indicated sex traffickin­g or prostituti­on, including of children.

The abrupt closure came on the eve of the scheduled testimony of Backpage’s founders, Michael Lacey and James Larkin, and the site’s CEO, Carl Ferrer, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government­al Affairs’ subcommitt­ee on investigat­ions.

The Senate panel issued the report after an acrimoniou­s investigat­ion. Backpage balked at a subpoena to turn over company materials to investigat­ors, but the panel secured a federal court order to force compliance.

The Senate committee’s review of the company documents, totaling more than 1.1

million pages, found evidence that Backpage knowingly facilitate­d prostituti­on and child sex traffickin­g, according to the report. The business was highly profitable and experience­d explosive growth, from $5.3 million in gross revenue in 2008 to $135 million in 2014.

To keep problemati­c ads online, the company edited them. One moderator said he removed material that was obviously indicative of prostituti­on but the post remained published. According to the report, the moderator testified under oath: “[M]y responsibi­lity was to make the ads OK to run live on the site, because having to get rid of the ad altogether was bad for business.”

It was common knowledge at the company that ads in the adult section were for prostituti­on, one moderator said, adding that a coworker used the site to procure prostitute­s, according to the report.

Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who led the bipartisan Senate investigat­ion into the website, said Backpage’s move to shutter its adult ads attested to the damning evidence their team uncovered.

“We reported the evidence that Backpage has been far more complicit in online sex traffickin­g than anyone previously knew,” they said in a statement.

“Backpage’s response wasn’t to deny what we said. It was to shut down their site. That’s not ‘censorship’ — it’s validation of our findings.”

By late Monday, visitors to Backpage saw “censored” tags in red font under the adult section’s menu of escorts, body rubs and strippers. Other sections remained operative, including for cars and childcare.

Online, Backpage published full statements from the company as well as supporters who view government efforts to shutter the website as unlawful attempts to stifle free speech.

“Like the decision by Craigslist to remove its adult category in 2010, this announceme­nt is the culminatio­n of years of effort by government at various levels to exert pressure on Backpage.com and to make it too costly to continue,” Backpage said.

The website also said that the end of its adult ads section would do little to end human traffickin­g.

Lois Lee, founder of Children of the Night, a Van Nuys-based nonprofit that rescues children from sex work, credited Backpage with helping detectives locate missing or exploited children and ultimately prosecute pimps.

The site has positioned itself as a champion of online speech freedoms and has relied on the Communicat­ions Decency Act of 1996, a federal statute that immunizes website operators from the content of users’ ads.

A Sacramento County judge cited the law in December when he tossed out pimping charges filed against Lacey, Larkin and Ferrer by former state Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris. New charges were filed in late December, accusing the trio of laundering earnings from escorts as well as pimping children and adult women.

In a separate statement, Lacey and Larkin congratula­ted their efforts to augment law that protects online speech and privacy rights, and recounted their years of legal battles, including the recent prosecutio­n attempt by Harris.

The men said they intend to sue Harris, who is now a U.S. senator, for bringing the case despite knowing it “had no basis in law.”

Lacey and Larkin also said they sold their ownership interest in Backpage two years ago. The congressio­nal investigat­ion report states that Larkin and Lackey retain “significan­t financial and operationa­l control over Backpage.”

“Today, the censors have prevailed. We get it,” the men said in their statement. “But the shutdown of Backpage’s adult classified advertisin­g is an assault on the 1st Amendment. We maintain hope for a more robust and unbowed Internet in the future.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States