Los Angeles Times

NEW TRUMP AIDE MARKS A SHIFT

A respected military strategist replaces the volatile Michael Flynn as national security advisor.

- By Michael A. Memoli and Laura King

PALM BEACH, Fla. — President Trump’s selection Monday of a cerebral, widely respected military strategist as his new national security advisor signaled an abrupt about-face from the chaotic tenure of Michael Flynn, forced out last week just shy of a month on the job.

The choice of Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, 54, who has a reputation for battlefiel­d acumen as well as scholarly achievemen­t, won quick bipartisan plaudits from key lawmakers charged with oversight of national security and intelligen­ce — a boon for a White House still seeking its footing after firstmonth missteps.

Trump infused his choice of Flynn’s replacemen­t with some of his trademark showmanshi­p, summoning his four finalists for interviews over the weekend before the announceme­nt of McMaster at his Mar-a-Lago resort here. The president then brought the cameras into an ornate sitting room to introduce McMaster, seated beside him in uniform, as “a man of tremendous talent and experience.”

“He is highly respected by everyone in the military, and we’re very honored to have him,” Trump said.

McMaster has deep combat experience — he commanded forces in both Iraq wars and fought in a famous tank confrontat­ion in the first Iraq war known as the Battle of 73 Easting — but lacks the intelligen­ce background Flynn had.

Whether that matters remains to be seen. Temperamen­tally, McMaster is far from the volatile Flynn, who had raised alarm in many quarters over his conspirato­rial outlook, his hotly antiIslami­c worldview and his murky ties to Russia.

Associates of the new national security advisor, whose appointmen­t will not require congressio­nal confirmati­on, have described him as tough and detail-oriented, with a wide-ranging intellect grounded in hardwon realism. He also has no

immediatel­y apparent connection­s to Russia, notable amid increasing calls in Washington for a congressio­nal investigat­ion into possible ties between Moscow and Trump’s associates.

“It is not an overstatem­ent to say that Americans and the world should feel a little safer today,” tweeted Andrew Exum, an author and academic who saw combat in Afghanista­n and writes widely about military affairs.

But McMaster, who will remain on active duty, as previous national security advisors Brent Scowcroft and Colin L. Powell did, will inherit a position already riddled with potential pitfalls.

Those include the ascension of White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon to a permanent seat on the National Security Council — a sharp departure from previous White Houses that sought to shield the most sensitive security decisionma­king from political influence.

McMaster’s greatest strengths could put him at loggerhead­s with Bannon and other powerful figures in the president’s camp.

He is perhaps best known for astute analysis underscori­ng the need to push back against power structures in both the military and the civilian leadership. McMaster turned his doctoral dissertati­on into a much-lauded book, “Derelictio­n of Duty,” which detailed the failings of senior presidenti­al aides as well as the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Vietnam War.

That willingnes­s to buck convention­al wisdom carried over into his battlefiel­d days in Iraq, where his thinking helped underpin the counter-terrorism strategy of Gen. David H. Petraeus, widely credited with changing the course of that war.

Until the weekend, Petraeus was himself thought to be under considerat­ion for the national security post, but his chances had been clouded by his forced resignatio­n as CIA chief after having an extramarit­al affair and sharing classified informatio­n with his lover.

Monday’s seemingly smooth rollout stood in sharp contrast to the tumult surroundin­g Flynn’s resignatio­n a week earlier, which came at Trump’s behest after it became publicly known that he had misled Vice President Mike Pence and other senior administra­tion officials about discussing U.S. sanctions with the Russian ambassador to Washington.

Trump’s first choice to succeed him, retired Vice Adm. Bob Harward, turned down the job amid reports that he had been unable to secure a pledge he would be able to pick his own staff. The insisted-on retention of deputy K.T. McFarland, a former Fox News commentato­r, was reportedly a deal breaker for Harward, who publicly cited family and financial concerns in declining the position.

The White House emphasized the autonomy being given to McMaster.

“The president gave full authority for McMaster to hire whatever staff he sees fit,” a White House spokeswoma­n told reporters.

It is highly unusual for even a retired senior military officer like Harward to resist the call of the commander in chief to such a crucial position. For an active-duty officer like McMaster, there was little question of him stepping up.

At Mar-a-Lago, McMaster said it would be a privilege to serve.

Praise for Trump’s pick came from both sides of the political aisle. Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), the ranking member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, said on Twitter that McMaster was a solid choice, bright and strategicm­inded.

“Wrote the book on importance of standing up” to the president, Schiff tweeted. “May need to show same independen­ce here.”

Even some of Trump’s sharpest critics on the Republican side were effusive. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who in recent days had expressed some highly public misgivings about the administra­tion’s foreign policy direction and fundamenta­l values, called McMaster an “outstandin­g choice” and “a man of genuine intellect, character and ability.”

“He knows how to succeed,” McCain said in a statement. “I give President Trump great credit for this decision.”

Another Republican, Rep. Devin Nunes of Tulare, who is chairman the House Intelligen­ce Committee, pointed to McMaster’s “history of questionin­g the status quo and infusing fresh thinking and new approaches into military affairs.”

Sen. Tom Cotton (RArk.), a veteran of the Iraq war, also hailed the selection, calling McMaster “one of the finest combat leaders of our generation … a true warrior-scholar.”

Somewhat tellingly, Trump answered only one of the multiple questions reporters asked at the announceme­nt: whether Pence had helped select McMaster.

“He did,” the president said.

Trump and Pence spoke earlier Monday by phone as the vice president wrapped up a trip to Europe in which he worked to reassure nervous allies about the U.S. commitment to NATO.

In Brussels, Pence for the first time publicly addressed Flynn’s misleading reassuranc­es to him — though without touching on the more explosive question of whether he felt left out of the loop after others in the White House learned weeks earlier that Flynn’s account did not square with intelligen­ce intercepts of the calls between him and the Russian ambassador.

“I was disappoint­ed to learn that the facts that had been conveyed to me by Gen. Flynn were inaccurate,” Pence said, adding that he had fully supported Trump’s decision to push out Flynn.

Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, who had been a contender for the job but considered unlikely to win it, was to stay on as McMaster’s chief of staff, Trump said. Another contender for the national security advisor’s job, former United Nations Ambassador John R. Bolton, was invited to play an unspecifie­d role in the administra­tion.

 ?? Susan Walsh Associated Press ?? ARMY LT. GEN. H.R. McMaster, left, President Trump’s new national security advisor, wrote a book about the failings of senior presidenti­al aides as well as the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Vietnam War.
Susan Walsh Associated Press ARMY LT. GEN. H.R. McMaster, left, President Trump’s new national security advisor, wrote a book about the failings of senior presidenti­al aides as well as the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Vietnam War.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States