Los Angeles Times

CPAC’s dance with Milo

- JONAH GOLDBERG jgoldberg@latimes columnists.com

On Saturday, Matt Schlapp, the head of the American Conservati­ve Union, which sponsors the premier conservati­ve confab, the Conservati­ve Political Action Conference, wrote on Twitter: “We think free speech includes hearing Milo’s important perspectiv­e. #CPAC2017.” On Monday, he announced that Milo Yiannopoul­os had been disinvited.

The decision to rescind the invitation was prompted by the surfacing of videos — long available on the Internet — in which Yiannopoul­os praised pederasty, i.e. sex between older men and pubescent boys as young as 13.

From the outset, many on the right who do not consider themselves part of the Cult of Milo opposed his invitation. The disturbing thing is that, absent these videos, we would have lost the fight. Even now, Schlapp defends the initial decision.

On Monday’s “Morning Joe,” he insisted: “The fact is, he’s got a voice that a lot of young people listen to.” A lot of young conservati­ve people, precisely because he enrages so many young liberals.

That’s part of the problem. We are in a particular­ly tribal moment in U.S. politics in which “the enemy of my enemy is my ally” is the most powerful argument around.

John Tooby, the evolutiona­ry psychologi­st, recently wrote that if he could explain one scientific concept to the public it would be the “coalitiona­l instinct.” In our natural habitat, to be alone was to be vulnerable. If “you had no coalition, you were nakedly at the mercy of everyone else, so the instinct to belong to a coalition has urgency, pre-existing and supersedin­g any policy-driven basis for membership,” Tooby wrote. “This is why group beliefs are free to be so weird.”

We overlook the hypocrisie­s and shortcomin­gs within our coalition out of a desire to protect ourselves from our enemies.

Today, the right sees the left as enemies — and, I should say, vice versa. Yiannopoul­os is a hero for many because he fights political correctnes­s and is transgress­ive. A flamboyant provocateu­r who wears his homosexual­ity on his sleeve and acts very much like a left-wing performanc­e artist, he gives the right an edgy cultural avatar to pit against the left. At a time when entertainm­ent and celebrity matter more than facts and arguments, he is an entertaini­ng celebrity.

Until recently, he was also a self-described “fellow-traveller” of the avowedly racist and antiSemiti­c “alt-right.” He advanced their worldview primarily from his perch as a senior editor of Breitbart News, the website formerly run by Stephen K. Bannon, now a senior advisor to President Trump, who once said he sought to make Breitbart “the platform for the alt-right.” (Yiannopoul­os resigned from Breitbart on Tuesday in the face of reported internal anger from staff.)

Last year, alt-righters hurled bigotry at Trump-skeptical journalist­s on social media. My National Review colleague David French was subjected to pictures of his adopted black daughter Photoshopp­ed into a gas chamber, with a Nazi uniform-clad Donald Trump poised to push the button.

Yiannopoul­os’ defense of all this is that it is funny and rebellious. “Just as the kids of the ’60s shocked their parents with promiscuit­y, long hair and rock ’n’ roll, so too do the alt-right’s young meme brigades shock older generation­s” with Holocaust jokes and Klan humor. It was, he and a colleague wrote for Breitbart, “undeniably hysterical.”

Well, I can deny it. Countless conservati­ves defend Yiannopoul­os (who admits he’s not a conservati­ve) in much the same way Democrats defended anti-Semitic “radio priest” Charles Coughlin as long as he supported the New Deal. Conservati­ves cling to rationaliz­ations. They say he “distanced” himself from the alt-right. He did, cynically — only after Donald Trump was elected. They credit his claim that he can say anti-Semitic things because his grandmothe­r was (allegedly) Jewish, and can say racist things because he sleeps with black men.

These are the kinds of arguments a coalition accepts when it has lost its moral moorings and cares only about “winning.” Free expression was never the issue. If it were, he’d be at CPAC — and Breitbart — expressing the case for ephebophil­ia. Apparently conservati­ves still draw the line there, but not at anti-Semitism or racism. The tent, sad to say, is big enough for that.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States