Los Angeles Times

U.S. ban on shark fin proposed

Lawmaker’s bill would follow California in prohibitin­g purchase or sale of the delicacy.

- LOUIS SAHAGUN louis.sahagun @latimes.com Twitter: @LouisSahag­un

It’s been four years since California’s ban on the purchase and possession of shark fins went into effect. And yet, more than 60 tons of shark fins arrive at the Port of Los Angeles each year, bound for chefs and grocers in states where sales of the Asian delicacy remain unfettered.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton) hopes to change that. On Thursday, he introduced a bill in Congress that would prohibit the buying, selling and possession of shark fins throughout the United States. If all goes according to plan, the measure would discourage the practice around the world.

The Shark Fin Sales Eliminatio­n Act “is needed to eradicate shark finning for good,” Royce, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement last week.

“While California led the way with a statewide ban, there are still almost 40 states where the purchase of shark fins is legal,” he said. “The United States can set an example for the rest of the world by shutting down its market for shark fins, which are often harvested by leaving these animals to die a slow and painful death at the bottom of the ocean.”

Experts estimate that as many as 73 million sharks become victims of the shark-fin trade each year. The fins sold for as much as $2,000 a pound in California before the ban took effect in 2013.

So far, 11 states including New York, Washington and Hawaii have joined California in banning the sale of shark fins. So have the Pacific territorie­s of Guam, American Samoa and the Commonweal­th of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Nineteen shipping companies and 36 airlines around the world have stopped carrying shark fins as cargo.

Despite the California ban, federal customs authoritie­s do not restrict the import and export of shark fins through Los Angeles or other ports in the state, a spokesman for Royce said. The congressma­n’s bill would change that by prohibitin­g the sale or possession of shark fins or any product containing shark fin.

The bill was originally introduced by Royce in June, but it didn’t make it out of committee before the 114th Congress came to a close. Supporters of the bill, including Oceana, a nonprofit organizati­on dedicated to protecting the world’s ocean environmen­t, believe it has a better chance this time because the 115th Congress has two years to act on it.

“By allowing the sale of shark fins from foreign fisheries that have little to no regulation­s, we’re indirectly incentiviz­ing the cruel and wasteful practice of shark finning that is putting the survival of many shark population­s in jeopardy,” Oceana spokeswoma­n Lora Snyder said.

“More than 92% of the shark fins coming into the United States — dried, frozen and canned — enter through Los Angeles,” she added.

Shark fin soup is a delicacy that dates back hundreds of years to China’s Ming Dynasty, when it was a symbol of status and power reserved for emperors.

Its chief culinary merit is a gelatinous texture, achieved through careful drying, precise trimming and a complex preparatio­n method that takes several days. To enhance its bland flavor, cooks often add chicken or ham to the broth.

As China’s middle class has grown, so has demand for the delicacy.

The Chinese government has announced that it is phasing out shark fins from official functions.

 ?? Louis Sahagun Los Angeles Times ?? DRIED SHARK FINS on sale in L.A.’s Chinatown for nearly $600 a pound in 2013, before a California ban on buying, selling and possessing them took effect.
Louis Sahagun Los Angeles Times DRIED SHARK FINS on sale in L.A.’s Chinatown for nearly $600 a pound in 2013, before a California ban on buying, selling and possessing them took effect.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States