Los Angeles Times

Proposed rule on pesticide use is softened

State agency revises notificati­on rule on crop dusting, other spraying near schools.

- By Samantha Masunaga samantha.masunaga@latimes.com

Before using pesticides near California public schools, growers would have to notify school and county agricultur­al officials, under a revised draft regulation released Thursday — but the notificati­on requiremen­ts would be less strenuous than what was proposed a few months ago.

In September, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation released a draft proposal that would ban crop dusting and many other forms of agricultur­al pesticide spraying within a quarter of a mile of public schools and day-care centers on weekdays between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m.

That original proposal said growers with fields within a quarter of a mile of school sites would have to provide officials with a list each year of all pesticides they expected to use, as well as a map showing the location of the field to be treated and other informatio­n.

The proposal also would have required growers to give officials 48 hours’ notice each time they sprayed pesticides in that quarter-mile zone. The revised proposal retains the quarter-mile zone and the ban that stretches from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays.

Under the revised regulation, growers still would need to provide officials with an annual list of pesticides, but would have to provide 48 hours’ notice only before using pesticides that were not on their original list.

The updated proposal also clarifies the definition of “school sites” covered under these regulation­s; excluding, for example, school buses or bus stops that are not on school property.

Growers have said that there was no reliable science to justify such a wide zone and such lengthy bans on spraying, and that this would boost costs and hurt their ability to protect crops from pests.

Cynthia Cory, director of environmen­tal affairs for the California Farm Bureau Federation, said the industry group supported a law passed in 2002 that gave counties’ agricultur­e commission­ers the ability to regulate use of pesticides within a quarter of a mile of schools because that law allowed for local control. But the state’s September proposal went too far, she said.

“While [the proposal] might have been simplified a little bit, I still stand on the same premise,” Cory said of the revised regulation.

“We believe this regulation will provide California­ns with probably the most robust protection in the nation for schoolchil­dren when agricultur­al pesticides are applied near their school,” Brian Leahy, director of the Department of Pesticide Regulation, said in a statement.

The rule is expected to go into effect Jan. 1, 2018. Some say the revised draft does not go far enough.

Paul Towers, spokesman for environmen­tal advocacy group Pesticide Action Network North America, said in an email that the proposed rule offers only “part-time protection­s” to students and that it does not provide “meaningful notificati­on about when the actual applicatio­ns take place.”

The department will seek public comment on the revised rule until April 4.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States