Los Angeles Times

‘It’s never too late to support equality’

Nevada Assembly votes to ratify Equal Rights Amendment — 35 years past deadline.

- By David Montero david.montero@latimes.com

LAS VEGAS — The moment felt historic enough that some lawmakers in Nevada’s Capitol autographe­d paper copies of the resolution.

Nevada’s state Assembly voted Monday 28 to 14 to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment — 35 years past the deadline set by Congress and four decades since the last state voted to adopt its language.

The vote marked a stirring victory for the resolution’s chief sponsor, Sen. Pat Spearman, the Las Vegasbased Democrat who had seen it fail previously when she tried to move the measure through the state Legislatur­e in 2015.

This month, the resolution narrowly passed the state Senate.

“We did it,” Spearman said shortly after the Assembly vote. “It was overwhelmi­ng, but we did it. It shows that it’s never too late to support equality.”

The ERA was first proposed in 1920s, but Congress didn’t pass it until 1972. The key part of its text reads: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.”

Thirty-eight state legislatur­es needed to ratify the proposed amendment, but it fell short by three when the deadline expired in 1982.

Many credit the defeat to the Eagle Forum, a conservati­ve lobbying group, and its founder, Phyllis Schlafly, who argued among other things that it would open women to being drafted into the military and combat.

Once the expiration date passed, groups such as the National Organizati­on for Women adopted a “threestate strategy” in hopes of getting to the three-quarters goal needed for ratificati­on. Some have suggested the 1982 deadline was arbitrary and believe Congress didn’t have the power to set a deadline for passage.

Terry O’Neill, president of NOW, said she hoped Nevada’s ratificati­on would embolden other states like Virginia and Illinois to follow the Silver State’s lead.

“Now it’s a two-state strategy,” she said. “It’s very exciting. Over the past five years, Illinois and Virginia have come close. I think there is clear interest in this.”

Since the early 1990s, supporters of the amendment have been trying to get a trio of the 15 state legislatur­es that rejected it to reverse course.

In Virginia, one chamber had approved ratificati­on while the other refused on multiple occasions in the last few years. Illinois had a similar scenario play out in 2014, but currently has a ratificati­on resolution alive in its legislativ­e session.

This year, Nevada was one of eight states with resolution­s calling for ratificati­on. But in six of those states — Utah, Arizona, Missouri, Virginia, Florida and North Carolina — at least one house of the Legislatur­e is controlled by Republican­s, who have opposed ERA ratificati­on.

Nevada flipped its Legislatur­e in November, with Democrats taking control of both chambers.

With its Legislatur­e at just about 40% women — the highest percentage in the nation — Spearman thought she had a good chance this year.

Hearings brought out large groups of supporters testifying — often emotionall­y — about the need for the ERA.

Spearman said after the Assembly’s vote, she thought of Nevada Democratic Party office manager Naomi Millisor, who died last week. Spearman said Millisor continuall­y had inspired her to keep pushing for passage of the measure.

“She was rooting for this and sadly didn’t live long enough to see it,” Spearman said. “She was a cheerleade­r for it, and I remember her telling me to stay with it. I had told her, ‘Yes, ma’am, it will pass.’ ”

Spearman said the resolution must go back to the Senate for some technical amendments before it is certified by the Nevada secretary of state and copies are transmitte­d to the National Archives and Records Administra­tion, the offices of the vice president of the U.S. and speaker of the House.

She said the state Senate votes on the amendments would probably happen Wednesday.

Republican Assemblywo­man Robin Titus opposed the resolution, saying she was “deeply disturbed by the theatrics” in the Legislatur­e over ERA ratificati­on.

“I don’t believe my constituen­ts sent me to cast symbolic votes with no chance of success,” Titus said.

While both legislativ­e chambers were mostly split down party lines, some Republican­s chose to back the resolution.

Jill Tolles, a Reno Republican, said she didn’t buy the arguments that the ERA would entrench abortions into the Constituti­on, and that even symbolic votes had a place in the Legislatur­e. She said legislator­s say the Pledge of Allegiance every day before the floor session starts and that the flag is a symbol for America. She said her wedding ring is symbolic of her commitment to her husband.

“I would argue this chamber is full of symbolism,” Tolles said.

Maggie Carlton, a Las Vegas Democrat, offered an impassione­d argument for the resolution, telling a story of her mother having to take off her wedding ring to go to work every day for fear of being fired. She said the company fired women who were married because they might have children and it would hurt productivi­ty.

Her story built on others who spoke about pay inequality and perception­s that President Trump’s administra­tion is rolling back rights for women through proposals to defund Planned Parenthood and appointing judges who appear to oppose abortion rights.

“I vote for this for today in honor of my mother, my grandmothe­r and my two daughters,” Carlton said. “Symbolism or not, it’s time to send the message.”

 ?? Benjamin Hager Las Vegas Review-Journal ?? NEVADA Sen. Pat Spearman, left, is the chief sponsor of the resolution. The ERA was passed by Congress in 1972, but failed to get enough support from the states.
Benjamin Hager Las Vegas Review-Journal NEVADA Sen. Pat Spearman, left, is the chief sponsor of the resolution. The ERA was passed by Congress in 1972, but failed to get enough support from the states.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States