Los Angeles Times

Trump’s GOP needs a bigger tent

- RONALD BROWNSTEIN Ronald Brownstein isa senior editor at the Atlantic. rbrownstei­n@nationaljo­urnal.com

Compared with the ongoing firestorm over Russia and healthcare, President Trump’s meeting with Congressio­nal Black Caucus leaders Wednesday might seem peripheral to a presidency careening through constant turmoil. But the session, which aired but didn’t resolve difference­s about the federal budget and other domestic issues, captured a critical test of his political movement’s long-term viability.

One of Trump’s most frequently expressed goals is reconstruc­ting the GOP as a “worker’s party” that appeals to blue-collar Americans across racial lines. Key Trump supporters recognize that building an enduring coalition will depend on attracting more working-class black, Latino and other minority voters to the agenda of economic nationalis­m that has riveted their white counterpar­ts.

“If eight years from now, the Trump agenda ... is only a white majority and it is hanging on by the skin of its teeth, because they are getting 29% of the Latino vote and 8% of the African American vote, it’s failed,” said Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the conservati­ve Ethics and Public Policy Center, who has broadly supported Trump’s vision.

Even Stephen Bannon, Trump’s senior strategist, has implicitly accepted that conclusion. In a revealing post-election interview with the Hollywood Reporter, Bannon put minorities center-stage in his long-term goals. “If we deliver,” Bannon said, “we’ll get 60% of the white vote and 40% of the black and Hispanic vote, and we’ll govern for 50 years.” With that, Bannon effectivel­y conceded that to secure a lasting GOP advantage, Trump needed not only big numbers among whites but also to make much greater inroads among nonwhites.

The force of demographi­c change largely explains why. In November, Trump carried a crushing two-thirds of white voters without a college education — exactly as much as Ronald Reagan in his 1984 landslide, and more than any Republican in between. But while Reagan’s dominance among blue-collar whites won him nearly 59% of the popular vote, it brought Trump just 46%; Reagan swept 525 electoral college votes, Trump 306.

That erosion reflects two critical changes, each of which pressures Trump to attract more minorities. One is that the number of working-class whites — the group most drawn to Trump — has steadily declined: They constitute­d nearly two-thirds of all voters in 1984 but just over one-third in 2016, according to media exit polls. The second change is that Trump’s bellicose nationalis­m provokes much greater resistance than Reagan faced among collegeedu­cated whites, whose numbers have steadily increased since the 1980s. Reagan carried those whitecolla­r whites by 24 percentage points, Trump by just three.

In office, Trump has continued to sharply divide whites along the diploma line. Figures provided by Gallup show that in an average of their daily tracking poll from mid-February to mid-March, a robust three-fifths of whites without a college degree approved of Trump’s job performanc­e, compared with just two-fifths of whites with such a degree. That’s one reason his overall approval numbers are so unusually low.

Over time, a Trump-style GOP will need more backing from working-class minorities to offset resistance from white-collar whites and the contractio­n of workingcla­ss whites in the electorate. But so far, Trump has posted little progress among blue-collar black or Latino voters. The Gallup tracking-poll average through mid-March found him drawing positive job ratings from only about one in six non-college-educated African Americans and just one-in-five Latinos without degrees.

Veteran Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, though, found a larger potential opening for Trump’s message when he gathered focus groups to watch the president’s congressio­nal address in late February. Minorities listening to the speech expressed significan­tly more confidence in Trump after it than before.

In those groups, minorities responded best to Trump’s promises to break the cycle of poverty, reform education and sustain NATO. Other polls suggest Trump’s tough talk about limiting imports and legal immigratio­n, overhaulin­g education, and rebuilding infrastruc­ture resonate with some minority voters who fear eroding economic opportunit­y.

But minorities in Greenberg’s focus groups also recoiled from Trump’s pledges to repeal the Affordable Care Act and build a border wall. Those reactions capture the barriers Trump faces. His determinat­ion to retrench government programs — apart from entitlemen­ts benefiting the mostly white senior population — threatens the interests of many minorities, particular­ly those without advanced education. Nearly 90% of the 8.95 million non-whites who gained health insurance under the ACA, for instance, lack college degrees, the Urban Institute found. And the racially barbed edge to Trump’s language (and agenda) on crime and immigrants who are in the country illegally creates an even greater obstacle for him with minority voters at all education levels.

Trump could squeeze out reelection in 2020 without advancing among minority voters because demographi­c change has come slowly to the Rust Belt states he relies on most. But as Republican pollster Whit Ayres noted in an interview, Trump’s “coalition alone extended out 10 or 15 years is not sufficient to continue to win the presidency.” Trump’s standing with minority voters may offer the most revealing measure of whether he’s reconfigur­ing the electorate to the GOP’s lasting advantage or lashing his party to a white identity politics that will steadily sink beneath waves of demographi­c change.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States