Los Angeles Times

Opponents cite high cost of wall

- lisa.mascaro@latimes.com Twitter: @LisaMascar­o

der,” Hurd, a former CIA officer whose district includes 800 miles along the border, more than any other lawmaker, said this year. “There is no question that we must secure our border, but we need an intelligen­ce-led approach.”

And the most conservati­ve Republican­s in the House and Senate — namely deficit hawks — oppose any new federal spending, even on national security, which has long been a GOP priority, unless it is offset with budget cuts elsewhere.

“People are pretty cleareyed,” said one Republican aide on Capitol Hill, granted anonymity to discuss the situation. “It’s an all-of-theabove solution, not necessaril­y a bricks-and-mortar wall from Brownsvill­e [Texas] to San Diego.”

For Democrats, the wall is a non-starter in budget talks, and an expenditur­e they would largely support in a broader immigratio­n overhaul to provide deportatio­n relief for up to 11 million immigrants in the country illegally.

That leaves Trump issuing an ultimatum for the wall that Congress may simply choose to ignore as talks continue toward a deal.

“Instead of risking government shutdown by shoving this wall down Congress’ and American people’s throats, the president ought to just let us come to an agreement,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on a conference call Monday with Democratic leaders.

“We’re happy to debate this wall in regular order down the road once he has a plan,” Schumer said, referring to Trump. “There’s no plan now; [he] just says build it.”

Congress had been heading toward Friday’s deadline hoping to bypass the kind of shutdown drama that has bedeviled Republican­s since they took the majority in the House and Senate.

Republican­s have been trying to accomplish other priorities — healthcare overhaul, tax reform — and don’t want to get mired in a budget battle.

Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) believe they have leverage over Republican­s in budget talks because of the dissent within the GOP over how much to spend on government operations. Republican­s almost always need to rely on Democratic votes to pass funding bills and avert shutdowns, and talks were underway to achieve a deal.

Trump had made a request last month for supplement­al spending — $34 billion extra for the military, plus $5 billion for the border wall and officers. But it largely landed with a thud on Capitol Hill.

Democrats panned beefing up defense expenditur­es without funding for other domestic needs, and the most conservati­ve Republican­s largely opposed any extra spending that wasn’t offset by cuts elsewhere.

Instead, bipartisan leaders were aiming for a deal that would give both defense and non-defense accounts a smaller, but equal, boost for the remainder of the 2017 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.

On a weekend conference call with lawmakers, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (RWis.) told them the priority would be dispatchin­g with the funding bill, according to someone familiar with the remarks.

Trump, however, apparently sensed his own leverage and started demanding that Congress agree to tack on $5 billion for the border wall.

“The Wall is a very important tool in stopping drugs from pouring into our country and poisoning our youth (and many others)!” the president tweeted Monday morning as lawmakers returned to Washington after a two-week break. “Eventually, but at a later date so we can get started early, Mexico will be paying, in some form, for the badly needed border wall.”

The administra­tion is approachin­g its 100-day mark on Saturday, and showing progress on the border wall — perhaps Trump’s most heavily repeated campaign promise — would be a notable accomplish­ment for an otherwise slim record of legislativ­e success.

To sweeten the deal for Democrats, the White House has proposed a $1for-$1 swap for healthcare funds to ensure lower-income Americans don’t lose their subsidies to help pay for insurance costs through the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

But that offer put the president’s Republican allies in the uncomforta­ble position of fighting for the border wall they only mildly want — and they doubt Mexico will ever pay for — while agreeing to prop up the Affordable Care Act that is a priority for Democrats.

For Democrats, it provides an easy argument that Trump is willing to gamble away Americans’ healthcare for what Pelosi calls the “rhetorical monstrosit­y” of the wall.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer tamped down shutdown fears Monday, insisting that talks would produce a workable solution.

“We feel very confident they understand the president’s priorities and will come to agreement by Friday,” he said.

But asked whether he could guarantee the shutdown threat was off the table, Spicer said he could not.

 ?? Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times ?? BORDER PATROL agents in Fronton, Texas, last month. “We’re happy to debate this wall in regular order down the road once he has a plan,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said of President Trump. “There’s no plan now; [he] just says build it.”
Brian van der Brug Los Angeles Times BORDER PATROL agents in Fronton, Texas, last month. “We’re happy to debate this wall in regular order down the road once he has a plan,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said of President Trump. “There’s no plan now; [he] just says build it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States