Los Angeles Times

Few areas in U.S. haven’t seen Chinese investment

- By David Pierson david.pierson@latimes.com

China continues to hold a massive trade surplus with the United States that’s on pace this year to again reach nearly $350 billion. But there’s a flip side of that trade gap as China invests billions back in America.

Investment from China is so prevalent that all but 10 of America’s 435 congressio­nal districts have received Chinese money, mostly through mergers and acquisitio­ns, according to a new report released Tuesday by Rhodium Group, a research firm.

Since 2000, no state has garnered more Chinese investment than California. The state’s 53 congressio­nal districts combined to receive $16.8 billion from China over that period, led by more than $3 billion each in districts represente­d by Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Porter Ranch). Sherman’s district is home to Legendary Entertainm­ent, which was acquired by Dalian Wanda Group in 2016 for $3.5 billion.

The Golden State now has 585 Chinese-linked enterprise­s, responsibl­e for 18,300 local jobs, the Rhodium report said.

New York came in second with $13.9 billion in investment since 2000. The state is home to 246 Chinese-affiliated companiest­hat employ a total of 8,400 people.

While still strong, the amount of Chinese investment probably will fall in 2017 after a record showing last year. Chinese regulation­s introduced at the end of 2016 aimed at staunching a staggering rate of capital flight have slowed U.S. investment­s from China to $9.3 billion the first quarter of this year, according to a separate Rhodium report. That’s down nearly 50% from China’s investment­s in the fourth quarter.

The slowdown comes after Chinese investment in the U.S. tripled to $46 billion between 2015 and 2016. The surge in investment is motivated by a desire to hedge against China’s slowing economy and weakening currency. But Chinese regulators fear too much money is leaving the country, often for nonstrateg­ic deals at costs well above what most companies should pay.

“Chinese capital controls are currently the most important policy variable shaping China-U.S. deal flow,” Rhodium wrote in a note to clients showing firstquart­er data for this year.

A number of high-profile deals have been scuttled in recent months, including Dalian Wanda Group’s $1-billion bid for Dick Clark Production­s and LeEco’s $2-billion deal for Vizio.

Regulators in Beijing aren’t the only challenge to continued growth in Chinese deals. Calls are growing in Washington to strengthen the review process for Chinese mergers and acquisitio­ns through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Some critics say China is gaining too much access into American media while U.S. companies don’t have the same open door in China.

A number of test cases are ongoing that could show how strict the Trump administra­tion will be on proposed Chinese deals. Among them is a $1.2-billion bid by Ant Financial, a subsidiary of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, for MoneyGram, a U.S. money transfer service. The proposed tie-up has been criticized on Capitol Hill as a national security threat.

 ?? Robyn Beck AFP/Getty Images ?? SINCE 2000, no state has seen more Chinese investment than California. Above, Legendary Entertainm­ent, which was bought last year by Dalian Wanda Group.
Robyn Beck AFP/Getty Images SINCE 2000, no state has seen more Chinese investment than California. Above, Legendary Entertainm­ent, which was bought last year by Dalian Wanda Group.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States