Los Angeles Times

A metaphoric­al border wall

-

Re “Trump’s wall slips further out of reach,” May 2

I was aghast at the comment by Mark Krikorian, who heads a tiny but loud conservati­ve, anti-immigratio­n think tank in Washington. He said, “Even if the wall did nothing, it would be important to get it through, because it is so essential to the message of controllin­g immigratio­n.”

Never mind the fact that the current barriers are compromise­d, and many scholars note that these barriers have little impact on migratory volume anyway (the demand for labor seems to have far more impact). Here, an apologist for President Trump essentiall­y admits that the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is mostly about symbolism.

It seems the cost of up to $70 billion just to build the wall represents a very high price for a dubious form of symbolic communicat­ion. Whatever happened to spending on infrastruc­ture inside the United States? Duncan Earle

San Pedro

How about telling the world we’ve built a hightech stealth wall?

It’s invisible. We could send out a bunch of mimes to pretend they’re touching it. Strategica­lly placed border agents would set off firecracke­rs when they see would-be crossers.

Trump, being a gifted showman who is good at creating diversions, just might go for it. Dave Cronkey

El Cajon

So Trump supporters want a bigger, better wall, and they want someone else to pay for it.

Who? The Mexicans! But they said no. Congress? Nope. Taxpayers? Nope.

So let the folks who want a snazzier wall pay for it. Start a crowdfund and offer a personaliz­ed brick for every donation above, say, $50. Trump supporters can take their kids and grandkids to visit their brick as proud owners of that beautiful wall. Joan Bloomer

Torrance

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States