Los Angeles Times

Will L.A. schools ease rules for meals?

Despite USDA shift, district likely to stick to its nutrition targets.

- By Howard Blume

Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue announced this week that his department would back away from enforcing the latest sodiumredu­ction target for school meals. In addition, schools won’t have to switch entirely to whole-wheat products, and they’ll be able to use flavored milk with 1% fat. (Previously, only nonfat flavored milk was allowed.) These standards were put in place by the Obama administra­tion and have been gradually taking effect.

Is L.A. Unified likely to relax its own standards now that the Trump administra­tion is doing so?

No.

Are the changes likely to affect local schools in some ways?

They could affect some schools and some school districts, but L.A. Unified, the state’s largest school

system, will continue to use the nutritiona­l targets set by the Obama administra­tion.

Where does L.A. Unified stand on nutrition standards?

L.A. Unified has been a national leader in improving nutritiona­l standards. But it has encountere­d some of the same problems that other school systems are complainin­g about, which include persuading students to eat healthier meals.

What are the arguments against the nutritiona­l guidelines establishe­d by the Obama administra­tion?

School districts and some related organizati­ons have complained that the rules need to strike a better balance between nutrition and taste appeal, because it’s better for students to eat school food rather than to skip these meals or substitute something unhealthfu­l instead — before or after school.

School systems also have borne some costs associated with higher standards without getting enough federal aid to cover these costs. One example is that the Obama-era rules upped the fruit content at breakfast from half a cup to a full cup, but did not provide funding for the extra fruit, said Joseph Vaughn, director of food services for L.A. Unified.

Is this another “extreme” right-wing move by the Trump administra­tion?

Not exactly. There are certainly many school districts that are likely to support these changes. And, yes, they move away from healthier alternativ­es, but not all the way to the extreme of unhealthfu­l alternativ­es.

The administra­tion did not, for example, backtrack all the way to 2% milk or to the eliminatio­n of all sodium standards.

How does the Trump administra­tion argue the need for these changes?

Here’s the anecdote offered by Perdue: “A perfect example is in the South, where the schools want to serve grits. But the wholegrain variety has little black flakes in it, and the kids won’t eat it. The school is compliant with the wholegrain requiremen­ts, but no one is eating the grits. That doesn’t make any sense.”

Food advocacy groups challenge such anecdotes. They contend that school systems were largely on track to meet the new guidelines and that such problems as childhood obesity justify strong nutritiona­l standards.

In any case, there was more than a little hyperbole in the headline of the federal announceme­nt: “Ag Secretary Perdue Moves to Make School Meals Great Again.”

Do the new federal regulation­s affect L.A. Unified policies on milk, which has been the subject of much recent discussion in the district?

As it happens, L.A. Unified this week began general distributi­on of flavored milk for the first time since 2011, when it was banned by then-Supt. John Deasy and the Board of Education. But the timing of this move is coincident­al to the federal announceme­nt. L.A. Unified is now serving nonfat flavored milk, which was always allowed. It is not considerin­g flavored milk with 1% fat, even though that is now permitted.

What else is happening on the food front in L.A. Unified?

The school system next fall will test having a vegan option at a group of schools. And the district’s chicken is sourced from providers who are scored based on how they treat their chickens, their employees and the environmen­t.

Do students like the healthy food at L.A. Unified?

Meal consumptio­n is up, and one reason may be that the district has made some concession­s to taste that, in some cases, have a nutritiona­l impact. Kids like breaded chicken more than grilled chicken, for example, so the district will offer more of that. But there’s still an issue with the preparatio­n of food in central kitchens. The food doesn’t always travel well, especially when it comes to preserving flavor. L.A. Unified also is behind some school systems in providing choices such as salad bars. The district has no plans in the near future to return to the era of cafeterias where the lunch ladies (and men) actually prepare the food at schools.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States