Los Angeles Times

Don’t let the Russia probe die

Comey’s firing must not derail a tough investigat­ion. Americans deserve to know the whole truth.

-

The shocking dismissal of FBI Director James B. Comey by a president whose campaign he was investigat­ing can’t be undone. The immediate priority is to safeguard the integrity of that investigat­ion and its credibilit­y in the eyes of the public and to preserve the evidence that has been amassed.

That means, first of all, that Comey must be replaced by an acting FBI director with an impeccable reputation for integrity. Equally important, Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein must announce immediatel­y that he will turn responsibi­lity for the investigat­ion of foreign interferen­ce with the 2016 election — including possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligen­ce operatives — to an independen­t special counsel empowered to take the probe wherever it may lead.

Rosenstein also should agree to testify at the earliest opportunit­y before Congress, where he must answer questions about how he came to provide President Trump and Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions with a not terribly credible written rationale for dismissing Comey related to his handling of an investigat­ion of Hillary Clinton’s email server. If Trump doesn’t want to be suspected of improper motives in Comey’s dismissal, he will waive any claim of executive privilege about any discussion­s with Sessions and Rosenstein leading to this decision.

The stakes here could not be higher. An election is a sacred undertakin­g in a democracy, and the possibilit­y that a foreign power — perhaps in collusion with the Trump campaign — meddled with last year’s presidenti­al race is profoundly distressin­g.

Comey’s firing has been compared to President Nixon’s decision in 1973 to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor who was investigat­ing the Watergate break-in and the subsequent coverup.

Because Sessions, who was an enthusiast­ic supporter of Trump’s candidacy, has recused himself from the investigat­ion, the decision about appointing a special counsel falls to Rosenstein.

Before Tuesday night, one could argue that Rosenstein, a respected career prosecutor, could credibly preside over the Russia investigat­ion. But his role in facilitati­ng Comey’s firing creates an insurmount­able appearance­s problem. He, too, must now recuse himself from the Russia investigat­ion. What’s more, he needs to ensure that the special counsel has maximum independen­ce.

It’s true that Justice Department regulation­s adopted in 1999 offer special counsels only limited authority. For example, the attorney general (or, in this case, Rosenstein) must be notified concerning significan­t actions the special counsel is to take, and may counterman­d any proposed action by the special counsel.

But, according to a study by the Congressio­nal Research Service, it would be permissibl­e to appoint a special counsel “with a greater degree of independen­ce and autonomy to conduct investigat­ions and prosecutio­ns.” That is what happened in 2003 when Patrick Fitzgerald was named as a special counsel “with all the authority of the attorney general” to investigat­e the leaking of the identity of Valerie Plame, a CIA agent.

That’s the model Rosenstein should follow in this case. Given Trump’s hostility to the investigat­ion — on Monday he tweeted that “The Russia-Trump collusion story is a total hoax” — it’s vital that other actors in Washington, including Congress, the Justice Department and the FBI, be prepared to ensure that any evidence of improper behavior be discovered and documented.

We don’t know where exactly the FBI’s investigat­ions will lead or whether Trump’s fulminatio­ns reflect an attempt at concealmen­t or simply the defense mechanisms of a fragile ego. What we do know is that the president has fired a public official who had stated publicly that his agency was investigat­ing the Trump campaign.

The attempt by Russia to affect the outcome of last year’s election was an assault on American democracy deserving of a serious investigat­ion, and that’s what the FBI appeared to be pursuing — especially in comparison with the unimpressi­ve efforts by committees in Congress that have been riven by partisansh­ip. Reportedly the FBI had made sufficient progress that Comey had sought additional funds from the Justice Department a few days before he was fired. It’s vital that this investigat­ion not be derailed by a petulant president with his own agenda. Comey may be gone, but the work he was doing must continue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States