Los Angeles Times

How much is too much for Republican­s?

- By Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON — They fume privately at President Trump’s coziness with the Russians. They wince almost every time he tweets. They talk among themselves about what might have been with a different Republican in the White House.

Yet even as each new crisis seems like it might be the event that moves GOP lawmakers away from Trump, key Republican leaders and rank-and-file members circle the White House, protecting the president from attack and shifting the blame to Democrats and the media.

Tuesday brought the sternest test yet of Republican willingnes­s to stand with the president, as multiple news organizati­ons reported that Trump had personally asked then-FBI Director James B. Comey to drop the bureau’s investigat­ion of former national security advisor Michael Flynn.

The news — denied by the White House — hit a Congress that already was stunned by Trump’s firing of Comey last week and his sharing of intelligen­ce with Russian diplomats.

Whether the latest allegation­s will prove to be the tipping point for more GOP lawmakers remains to be seen, but initial reactions suggested many were standing behind the president.

Senate Intelligen­ce Committee Chairman Richard M. Burr (R-N.C.), who had voiced frustratio­n over

Trump’s informatio­n-sharing with the Russians, cast doubt Tuesday evening on news reports that Trump had tried to stop the Flynn investigat­ion.

“I actually believe the director might have told us that there’d been a request like that, and it was never mentioned by him,” Burr said. “So somebody’s going to have to do more than have anonymous sources on this one for me to believe that there’s something there.”

Rep. Louie Gohmert (RTexas) said it “almost sounds like fake news.”

But centrist Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) said that if the Comey allegation­s were true, “it would be deeply, deeply troubling, disconcert­ing, and it would open a new chapter of scandal.”

In some ways, it’s little surprise that Republican­s in Congress are supporting Trump. They are largely reflecting their constituen­ts’ views, and polling shows Republican voters, and those who cast ballots for Trump, still overwhelmi­ngly back the president.

But more to the point, if Republican­s were to break ranks with the White House and begin to question Trump’s ability to govern, what would happen next?

Any acknowledg­ment by Republican­s that Trump’s actions are unacceptab­le would lead to inevitable questions about what exactly Congress planned to do about it. And Republican­s don’t appear ready to answer that.

Very few Republican­s have joined Democrats in seeking a special prosecutor or independen­t panel to investigat­e the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russian meddling in the election — much less in the calls for impeachmen­t.

On Tuesday, however, Rep. Steve Knight of Palmdale became the third House Republican from California to back a special prosecutor. “There is so much conflictin­g informatio­n from many sources; Americans deserve the opportunit­y to learn the truth,” he said in a statement.

The dilemma for Republican­s was on full display Tuesday in conversati­ons and statements on Capitol Hill. While a handful of GOP lawmakers voiced rising concern over Trump’s behavior, many stood by him.

“This man is subject to more criticism than anybody, any predecesso­r that I know of,” said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah). “It was a remarkable election and they can’t stand it, so they’re going to do everything they can to destroy him. It’s just that simple.”

Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), former chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, said most new administra­tions had a rough start.

“Look at President Clinton: When he started off, he had a real bumpy road for about a year and a half,” Shelby said. “Let’s see what happens the next six-seven months. Everything’s another day.”

Republican­s are loath to derail their opportunit­y to make good on promises to cut taxes, repeal Obamacare and undo federal regulation­s as they control the White House and Congress.

They know a Trump White House embroiled in scandal and investigat­ions would be effectivel­y crippled, and already the GOP legislativ­e agenda has been overshadow­ed.

Trump is “trying to accomplish a number of things we ran on, so he’s got quite a bit of support,” said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.). “It doesn’t help to have a controvers­y swirling, but I can’t say that it’s distractin­g us from getting things done.”

Democrats, appalled by Trump’s behavior, are pushing Republican­s to move beyond partisansh­ip.

“The country is being tested in unpreceden­ted ways,” said Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer. “I say to all of my colleagues in the Senate: History is watching.”

Democrats are demanding transcript­s of Trump’s conversati­on with the Russian ambassador and foreign minister as well as any tape recordings Trump may have made in relation to his contact with Comey.

After the New York Times reported that Comey kept private memos of his conversati­ons with Trump, including the one in which he claimed Trump asked him to drop the Flynn inquiry, Democrats are pushing to see those records as well.

A few Republican­s are ready to join that effort. “I have my subpoena pen ready,” said Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chair of the House Oversight Committee.

But Democrats’ plea to Republican­s so far has proved little match for Trump’s staying power and ability to survive political missteps that would fell other politician­s.

During the presidenti­al campaign, when a recording emerged of Trump boasting about sexually groping women with impunity because of his celebrity status, many Republican­s, including House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, distanced themselves from his campaign.

But then Republican voters by and large gave their candidate a pass, and Ryan and others had to scramble to mend their relationsh­ip with him.

Many GOP lawmakers continue to say the media are treating Trump unfairly.

“He is, I think, having a volatile ride from a media perspectiv­e, but the underlying policies that I think are good for the country — tax reform, healthcare reform, rolling back the regulatory agenda of the past administra­tion — all of these have a very consistent­ly positive impact,” said Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.).

Others could not easily put an optimistic spin on the concerns churning from the White House.

“These are daily — well, not daily, hopefully, but seems like lately daily — distractio­ns, and you just have to manage around it,” said the Senate’s slightly exasperate­d No. 3 Republican, John Thune of South Dakota. “We’re proceeding according to plan, but less drama on the other end of Pennsylvan­ia Avenue would be a good thing.”

Centrist Republican­s were those most eager to distance themselves from Trump.

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (RIll.) tweeted Tuesday: “Sharing classified info to one of our enemies is a threat to our national security, troops on the ground & relationsh­ips w/ trusted allies.”

Said GOP Rep. Barbara Comstock, from a swing district in Virginia: “Once again we are faced with inexplicab­le stories coming from the White House that are highly troubling.”

Asked whether he trusted Trump to handle classified informatio­n, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) — who Monday warned of the White House’s “downward spiral” — shrugged: “Sure.”

 ?? J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press ?? BOB CORKER, Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair, was critical of the administra­tion Monday, but Tuesday didn’t question Trump’s trustworth­iness.
J. Scott Applewhite Associated Press BOB CORKER, Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair, was critical of the administra­tion Monday, but Tuesday didn’t question Trump’s trustworth­iness.
 ?? Mark Wilson Getty Images ?? RICHARD M. BURR, left, Senate Intelligen­ce panel chair, said he was skeptical of reports that President Trump tried to stop the Michael Flynn-Russia inquiry.
Mark Wilson Getty Images RICHARD M. BURR, left, Senate Intelligen­ce panel chair, said he was skeptical of reports that President Trump tried to stop the Michael Flynn-Russia inquiry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States