Los Angeles Times

Two deputies sue former boss and ex-prosecutor

They were victims of a vendetta and crucial evidence was withheld in their court case, suit claims.

- By Maya Lau maya.lau@latimes.com

Two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies say that they were framed on charges of lying about a drug bust and that prosecutor­s knowingly withheld evidence that would have spared them a trial, lost wages and public humiliatio­n, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The lawsuit names former Undersheri­ff Paul Tanaka and former county prosecutor Kevin Stennis, who now serves as a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge.

Deputies Robert Lindsey and Charles Rodriguez were accused in 2013 of writing false reports after a surveillan­ce video apparently contradict­ed their accounts of the 2011 arrest of a man on suspicion of dealing drugs.

They were acquitted in 2015 of perjury and conspiracy charges stemming from the arrest.

In their civil rights complaint, Lindsey and Rodriguez allege that the whole ordeal was the result of a sham investigat­ion orchestrat­ed by Tanaka as part of a vendetta against Lindsey’s father, a retired Sheriff ’s Department commander. According to the lawsuit, Tanaka told the elder Robert Lindsey his career “was over” after Lindsey refused to falsify exam results so that Tanaka’s chosen deputies could be promoted to lieutenant in 2002.

Tanaka has since been convicted of obstructin­g a federal investigat­ion of abuses in the county’s vast jail system. He was painted by prosecutor­s as an ironfisted manager and the ringleader of the obstructio­n plot that ultimately ended in criminal conviction­s for more than 20 officials, including former Sheriff Lee Baca.

An attorney for Tanaka, who is serving a five-year prison term at a minimumsec­urity facility in Colorado, was not immediatel­y available for comment.

Lindsey, 35, and Rodriguez, 42, also cite evidence that Stennis engaged in a behind-the-scenes email exchange with the sister of the suspect and dangled the possibilit­y of securing a visa for the man. The suspect, whose alias was “Abraham Rueda” and whose real name is Uriel Salgado, was in the U.S. illegally and was the prosecutio­n’s key witness in the case against Lindsey and Rodriguez.

In the emails, Stennis writes about how he might be able to have his superiors help secure a U visa for Salgado, who had been convicted several times on drug charges, according to the lawsuit. The U visa program was designed to help crime victims who had suffered physical and psychologi­cal abuse and to aid in the prosecutio­n of domestic violence, sexual assault and human traffickin­g.

In an email exchange reviewed by The Times, Salgado’s sister Veronica Flores implores Stennis to write a letter on Salgado’s behalf for the visa, but Stennis says it would have to wait until the case is finished.

“The problem with the U visa is our office won’t consider it until the case is over because we can’t make it appear that we are doing it to gain favor for his testimony,” Stennis wrote.

He wrote in another email: “I personally can’t do it because it will be considered ‘improper’ on the present case and I would have to disclose it to the defense attorneys and a big problem would occur.”

Mary Hearn, a spokeswoma­n for the Los Angeles County Superior Court, said Stennis would not comment because judges could not discuss active cases.

Ron Kaye, the attorney for Lindsey and Rodriguez, said the email exchange should have been disclosed by prosecutor­s during the discovery phase before the first preliminar­y hearing in February 2014, and could have resulted in the case being dismissed. Instead, the emails came to light by chance in cross-examinatio­n during the trial in June 2015.

Under a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brady vs. Maryland, prosecutor­s must turn over exculpator­y material, such as evidence that impairs a witness’ credibilit­y.

The underlying criminal case against Salgado was dropped on Aug. 18, 2011, after the surveillan­ce video emerged and called the deputies’ reports into question. The same day, former Capt. William “Tom” Carey, who reported directly to Tanaka, initiated an investigat­ion into Lindsey and Rodriguez, according to the lawsuit.

Carey was sentenced Monday to nine months in prison after admitting to a role in the jail inquiry obstructio­n scheme.

The first time prosecutor­s tried to charge Lindsey and Rodriguez with lying on their police reports, Salgado failed to show up at a preliminar­y hearing and the case was dismissed. But the case was refiled and at some point Lindsey’s defense attorney, Kasey Sirody, asked Stennis why he was prosecutin­g the case again.

Sirody said in a declaratio­n that Stennis told her a sheriff’s official had met with Stennis’ boss and he was told to refile the charges.

The lawsuit doesn’t name the sheriff ’s official.

A spokesman for the district attorney’s office declined to speak on the matter. A Sheriff’s Department representa­tive had no immediate comment.

Prosecutor­s contended the video appeared to show that Lindsey lied in a report about where he was standing when he said he spotted cocaine in Salgado’s SUV, and that he was positioned in such a way that he couldn’t have seen the drugs and couldn’t have justified a search. Prosecutor­s also alleged that Rodriguez falsely wrote that the SUV was towed from the scene. They asserted that Rodriguez drove the vehicle away himself.

But Sirody said the video in fact corroborat­ed what the deputies wrote.

“If anything, he wrote a brief, middle-of-the-night report, but it’s not different than what’s shown in the video,” Sirody said of Lindsey’s report.

Lindsey said in 2015 that after they were acquitted, every juror approached him and Rodriguez to thank them for their service.

Lindsey said at a news conference Wednesday that his trial had him “scraping for money and borrowing money” from his family.

“Just the sheer embarrassm­ent” was a hardship, he said. “It was just a very trying time for me and my family.”

Lindsey and Rodriguez were reinstated as deputies in February but given only a year’s worth of back pay instead of being reimbursed for the 2½ years they were on leave.

Lindsey is assigned to a courthouse and Rodriguez helps transport inmates, though they would prefer to go back to patrol, Kaye said.

 ?? Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times ?? ATTORNEY Ron Kaye, center, is f lanked by sheriff ’s deputies Robert Lindsey, left, and Charles Rodriguez.
Irfan Khan Los Angeles Times ATTORNEY Ron Kaye, center, is f lanked by sheriff ’s deputies Robert Lindsey, left, and Charles Rodriguez.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States