Los Angeles Times

With video push, Facebook eyes TV-style content

Firm is teaming up with news outlets such as BuzzFeed to deliver shows with ad breaks.

- david.pierson@latimes.com paresh.dave@latimes.com Times staff writer Tracey Lien contribute­d to this report.

To make its mobile app as indispensa­ble as possible, Facebook has introduced live streams, a booming virtual bazaar and free access to some of the best journalism.

But among the major missing pieces have been the kind of exclusive, Hollywood-style comedies, docuthe mentaries and dramas that are found on YouTube, Amazon, Netflix and, to a lesser degree, Snapchat. As subscripti­ons to cable TV decline, these online services have been there to capture the shift in subscripti­on and advertisin­g dollars.

Now, Facebook is making its latest play for the lucrative business by teaming up with online news outlets such as BuzzFeed and Vox to deliver videos that will contain commercial breaks.

The companies already make some of the most popular videos on Facebook, including mouth-watering cooking clips and animated shorts explaining topics in news.

But the yet-to-be announced partnershi­ps, first reported by Reuters on Wednesday, hope to take the videos up a notch, and potentiall­y give Facebook content that can’t be found elsewhere.

That will include scripted shows lasting 20 to 30 minutes and shorter scripted and unscripted shows with episodes lasting about five to 10 minutes. Facebook will own the longer shows and license the shorter ones, sources told Reuters.

The social media giant will reportedly pay as much as $250,000 for the longer

shows and $10,000 to $35,000 for the shorter variety, whose creators will get 55% of any ad revenue generated.

It’s a small price to pay for a company with more than $32 billion in cash and marketable securities — compared with about $1.2 billion for Netflix — to set itself as a prime destinatio­n in the new age of TV, analysts say.

“Facebook’s business model has been built around driving users to access Facebook multiple times per day,” said Brett Sappington, research director at consulting firm Parks Associates.

Nearly every time they come, users see ads — and each video ad can bring in up to 10 times the cash of the standard image-and-text variety.

“This move is more about how to keep users immersed in the Facebook experience and watching more ads,” Sappington said.

Many users will use multiple apps to watch videos, including YouTube and Snapchat, but Facebook doesn’t want to cede too much ground.

Last year, Facebook tried to jump ahead of the video curve by prioritizi­ng live broadcasti­ng from smartphone­s before most of its major rivals, save for Twitter. It even paid many of the same companies, including BuzzFeed, millions of dollars to experiment with live streams that led to viral sensations. But the efforts have struggled to gain sustained viewership, and Facebook has faced criticism for allowing its live-video technology to be used to broadcast violence and crimes.

Facebook has gleaned much from the streaming service — including data showing longer video content drives more usership, said Nick Cicero, founder and chief executive of Delmondo, which is providing Facebook with analytics about the service.

“The longer a video, the more engaged people are,” Cicero said.

The new round of financing for media partners suggests Facebook may be backing down from Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg’s prized live-video initiative. The company appears to be going with a more tried-and-true approach of TV-like shows and more familiar live programmin­g, primarily sports matches, including Major League Baseball.

Other partners in the new initiative include Attn:, which focuses on news video designed for mobile devices, and Group Nine Media, which owns digital properties such as Thrillist, NowThis and the Dodo.

None of the partners, including Facebook, agreed to interview requests Thursday. Sources at two of the companies speaking on the condition of anonymity confirmed the partnershi­p, which is still being ironed-out to determine what kind of shows will be included.

“Facebook’s probably not trying to go with the Netflix or HBO approach by buying the next ‘House of Cards’ or ‘Game of Thrones,’ ” said RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Mahaney. “They’re not trying to hit home runs. They’re trying to hit a lot of singles.”

The Los Angeles area stands to benefit. Much of the new video is likely to be produced and edited in the region, where BuzzFeed and Vox have establishe­d presences and GroupNine recently opened an office.

Zuckerberg has long been rumored to be interested in original video content. During an earnings call this month, Zuckerberg said he was seeking compelling original content to drive users to the app’s video tab.

“The goal is going to be creating some anchor content initially,” Zuckerberg said. “And then the longterm goal is actually not to be paying for specific content like that but doing a revenue-share model once the whole economy around video on Facebook is built up.”

Like any new feature, Facebook will need to introduce the videos carefully so that they don’t interfere with the existing products, experts said.

“An important key to success will be in adding this content service to the existing Facebook experience in a way that does not alienate the current user base,” Sappington said. “Even small changes to the core experience can be a risky propositio­n. If users feel that they are being forced down a path without an ability to opt out, they will simply leave for an alternativ­e.”

 ?? Jay L. Clendenin Los Angeles Times By David Pierson and Paresh Dave ?? THE PARTNERSHI­PS may give Facebook video content that can’t be found elsewhere, including scripted shows. Above, BuzzFeed’s L.A. newsroom.
Jay L. Clendenin Los Angeles Times By David Pierson and Paresh Dave THE PARTNERSHI­PS may give Facebook video content that can’t be found elsewhere, including scripted shows. Above, BuzzFeed’s L.A. newsroom.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States