Los Angeles Times

School vouchers will test our democracy

- By Jonah Edelman and Randi Weingarten Jonah Edelman is chief executive of Stand for Children, which advocates for quality public education. Randi Weingarten is president of the American Federation of Teachers.

President Trump wants to siphon billions of dollars from public schools to fund private and religious school vouchers. It’s an idea that’s bad for kids, public education and our democracy.

Today, vouchers are used by less than 1% of the nation’s students. Trump and his Education secretary, Betsy DeVos, want to change that. Trump’s new budget proposal would make historic cuts to federal education spending, while diverting $1 billion into voucher programs — a “down payment” on his oft-repeated $20-billion voucher pledge. We believe the president’s plan would deal a terrible blow to public schools and to the 90% of America’s children who attend them, while doing almost nothing to benefit children who receive vouchers.

Although our organizati­ons have sparred and disagreed over the years, such is the danger to public schooling posed by Trump’s embrace of vouchers that we are speaking out together on this issue. The Trump-DeVos effort to push vouchers, or something equivalent through tax credits, threatens the promise and purpose of America’s great equalizer, public education.

At a time when low-income children make up the majority of public school students, we as a country must do more to support families, teachers, administra­tors and public schools. Trump’s plan would do the opposite.

Public schools have never fully recovered from the Great Recession. Research, common sense and our collective experience­s working with children, families and schools tell us that we must invest in, not cut back, public education. That means providing high-quality preschool for kids, and the social, health and mental health services they need. It means making sure students are reading at grade level by the end of third grade; that they have powerful learning opportunit­ies, including career and technical training that can prepare them for college and work; and that they are guided by well-supported teachers and other education specialist­s. It means addressing the federal government’s deep underfundi­ng of special education and building a culture of collaborat­ion among teachers, administra­tors, parents and communitie­s.

The Trump-DeVos budget and voucher plans, while still lacking in details, would eliminate more than 20 education initiative­s, including after-school and summer programs, career and technical education, teacher profession­al developmen­t and funding to lower class size. Public money would go instead to schools that lack the accountabi­lity and civil rights protection­s of public schools. DeVos alarmingly fueled these concerns during a congressio­nal hearing last week, when she repeatedly declined to say the Department of Education would withhold vouchers from schools that discrimina­te, including against LGBT students or students with disabiliti­es. She similarly sidesteppe­d questions about accountabi­lity.

We believe taxpayer money should support schools that are accountabl­e to voters, open to all, nondenomin­ational and transparen­t about students’ progress. Such schools — district and charter public schools — are part of what unites us as a country.

Champions of an essentiall­y unregulate­d, free-market approach to K-12 education, including DeVos, counter that theirs is a better path to helping students in need. But the facts show that where vouchers have been put into practice on a meaningful scale, they hurt student learning.

In April, the research arm of the Department of Education released a study of the federally mandated voucher program in Washington. It showed voucher students did worse in math than similar public school students, and it adds to a growing body of education research that concludes that vouchers may harm rather than help student achievemen­t. In fact, the results of voucher tests, compared with other reforms, are the worst in the history of the field, according to Kevin Carey, education policy director at New America.

Administra­tion officials have suggested what amounts to a “back door” way to increase the reach of vouchers: tax credits for corporatio­ns and the rich who contribute to third-party voucher funds. The nation’s School Superinten­dents Assn. looked at states where such credits are already in place and found that, in some cases, the donors have been able to make a profit off the backs of taxpayers and ultimately kids. And what Carey calls the “shell game” of moving money through these funds makes it difficult to account for how the money is spent.

The Trump administra­tion’s perverse priorities are increasing­ly clear: Impose the biggest cuts to federal education funding in memory and slash support to poor children and families by cutting Medicaid, food stamps and other programs, all while cutting taxes for the rich. It is an agenda that betrays millions of families seeking a better life, and one at odds with what this country stands for. Public schools are a fundamenta­l engine of opportunit­y in this country. We will stand together to defend them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States